Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41631082›Full record

ReviewCureus2026

Histological and Immunohistochemical Biomarkers for Wound Age Estimation in Human Skin: A Systematic Review.

Anas E Ahmed, Wassal F Aljohani, Akram K Moafa, Faisal A Hattan, Yaser A Altalhi, Nawaf S Alsulamy, Zayad M Albalawi, Feras M Aldhubayi, Abdulwhab A Alatawi, Nawaf K Alqahtani

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Anas E AhmedCommunity Medicine, Jazan University, Jazan, SAU.
Wassal F AljohaniCollege of Medicine, Taif University, Taif, SAU.
Akram K MoafaCollege of Medicine, Jazan University, Jazan, SAU.
Faisal A HattanGeneral Practice, Taif University, Taif, SAU.
Yaser A AltalhiCollege of Medicine, Jazan University, Jazan, SAU.
Nawaf S AlsulamyPediatrics, Royal Commission Hospital, Yanbu, SAU.
Zayad M AlbalawiCollege of Medicine, Tabuk University, Tabuk, SAU.
Feras M AldhubayiCollege of Medicine, Qassim University, Buraydah, SAU.
Abdulwhab A AlatawiCollege of Medicine, Tabuk University, Tabuk, SAU.
Nawaf K AlqahtaniCollege of Medicine, Tabuk University, Tabuk, SAU.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Accurate estimation of wound age is a critical challenge in forensic pathology, particularly for determining wound vitality and the interval between injury and death. Conventional histology often lacks sensitivity in the early post-traumatic stages, prompting investigation into molecular and immunohistochemical biomarkers. This review synthesizes evidence on histological and immunohistochemical markers used for wound age estimation in human skin, with attention to their applicability across different post-traumatic intervals. Very early wounds, from minutes up to one hour, are best characterized by markers related to haemostasis, mast cell activation, and early cytokine release, including fibronectin, CD62p (P-selectin), factor VIII-related antigen, tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α), and tryptase. Early wound stages, spanning hours, show transient mast cell accumulation and cytokine expression preceding inflammatory cell infiltration. Intermediate wounds, from one to ten days, are associated with immune cell phenotyping and chemokine expression, such as CD14, CD68, interleukin-8 (IL-8), monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 (MCP-1), and macrophage inflammatory protein-1 alpha (MIP-1α). Late wounds, seven days or more, are marked by indicators of hypoxia response, angiogenesis, cellular stress, and extracellular matrix remodeling, including oxygen-regulated protein 150 (ORP150), ubiquitin, vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), matrix metalloproteinases, collagens, and aquaporins. No single marker provides sufficient accuracy across all healing phases, highlighting the need for multimodal approaches that combine morphological assessment with panels of temporally complementary biomarkers. Standardization of methods and additional high-quality human studies are essential to improve the reliability and forensic applicability of wound age estimation.

Indexed as

angiogenesisbiomarkerscytokinesextracellular matrixforensic pathologyhistologyimmune cellsimmunohistochemistrymast cellswound age estimation

Identifiers

PMID41631082
PMCPMC12861040

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.