Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41631081›Full record

ArticleCureus2026

Analysis of Online Resource Utilization Among Individuals With Vitiligo.

Nneka Ede, Prachi Khanna, Beth Schneider, Ammar Ahmed

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Nneka EdeDermatology, Dell Medical School at The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, USA.
Prachi KhannaDermatology, Dell Medical School at The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, USA.
Beth SchneiderInformatics, MyHealthTeam, San Francisco, USA.
Ammar AhmedDermatology, Dell Medical School at The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background Few studies have assessed the usage of online resources by vitiligo patients. Our goal was to determine what information and sources individuals with vitiligo seek out on the internet and how this information affects them. Methods A 15-question cross-sectional survey related to online resources and their impact was developed and distributed to users on the MyVitiligoTeam forum from May to June 2022. The questionnaire gathered information on participants' demographics, their engagement with online resources, and the impact of this information. Descriptive statistics were completed with Qualtrics (Provo, Utah, United States). Results There were 95 responses. The majority of respondents (n = 72, 79.12%) reported currently using online resources to talk about or learn about vitiligo, with the most frequently utilized resources being medical websites (n = 35, 55.56%), vitiligo-specific organizations (n = 30, 47.62%), and social media (n = 21, 33.33%). When asked about the most useful resources for managing vitiligo, participants prioritized vitiligo-specific websites (37.25%) and social media (17.65%). The most important reasons for seeking out information online were for seeking out medical advice from healthcare professionals or organizations, learning about the cause of vitiligo, and exploring treatment experiences. The biggest impact yielded by online resources has been learning to cope with and manage psychosocial aspects of the condition (n = 20, 37.74%). Conclusions This study reveals the depth of influence that online resources have on vitiligo patients as they cope and manage their disease, particularly the significant psychosocial benefits. The findings show the psychosocial benefits of online engagement in supporting vitiligo patients.

Indexed as

internetonline health resourcesonline resourcesquality of lifevitiligo

Identifiers

PMID41631081
PMCPMC12861039

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.