ArticleCureus2026
Safety and Efficacy of Colonic Stenting as a Bridge to Surgery: A Retrospective Study.
Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective The objective of this study was to establish the safety and efficacy of stenting as a bridge to surgery (BTS) by comparing outcomes in patients who underwent stenting followed by surgery with those who proceeded directly to surgery. Methodology Data were collected retrospectively for all patients who presented with left-sided malignant colonic obstruction between April 1, 2021, and December 31, 2024, at the Surgical Oncology Department, Shaukat Khanum Memorial Cancer Hospital and Research Centre, Peshawar, Pakistan. In this observational, non-randomized study, all patients of either gender aged 18 years or older with biopsy-proven left-sided colon cancer were included. Patients with metastatic disease were excluded. Results A total of 29 patients were included in this study, out of which 22 (75.9%) underwent stenting as a BTS, while seven (24.1%) went straight to surgery without stenting. The most frequent procedure in the stenting group was laparoscopic anterior resection with anastomosis (n = 14); while, in the non-stenting group, Hartmann's procedure (n = 7) was predominant. Overall, seven patients (24.1%) developed perforation; however, the difference in perforation rates between the two groups was not statistically significant (p = 0.753). Stoma formation was significantly lower in the stenting group (p = 0.018). Key perioperative parameters did not show any statistically significant changes between the stented and non-stented groups. Conclusions Colonic stenting is a safe and viable option in patients with left-sided malignant colonic obstruction to decompress the bowel, which results in significantly higher rates of primary anastomosis and avoidance of stoma.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.