ArticleAmerican heart journal plus : cardiology research and practice2026
Predicting cardiovascular diseases using imbalanced data: An XGBoost-based analysis of the 2022 BRFSS dataset.
Article in American heart journal plus : cardiology research and practice, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Leakage-Safe Precision-Aware Dual-Branch FT-Transformer for Population-Scale Heart Disease Risk Prediction.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- SIRT1 in Cardiac Diseases: Molecular Mechanisms, Therapeutic Potential, and Future Directions.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) remain the leading cause of mortality worldwide, arising from complex interactions among demographic, clinical, behavioral, and social determinants. Leveraging large, nationally representative datasets such as the 2022 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS) offers a unique opportunity to identify emerging risk patterns, monitor population-level disparities, and inform more targeted prevention strategies. Methods: A total of 221,643 participants from the BRFSS 2022 survey were included after excluding records with missing data. Thirteen key predictors spanning demographics, chronic conditions, and social factors were selected. Data were split into training (80%) and testing (20%) sets. Four machine learning models, XGBoost, Random Forest, Logistic Regression, and Naive Bayes, were developed and evaluated using stratified 10-fold cross-validation. Model performance was assessed via accuracy, F1 score, precision, sensitivity, and ROC AUC. Synthetic Minority Over-sampling Technique (SMOTE) addressed class imbalance. SHAP values provided insights into feature importance and model interpretability. Results: XGBoost demonstrated the best predictive performance (accuracy 94.2%, F1 score 85.3%, ROC AUC 0.94). SHAP analysis highlighted age ≥ 65, male gender, and diabetes as the strongest predictors, with additional contributions from kidney disease, employment status, and social isolation. Protective effects were observed for never smoking and higher education. Stratified analyses revealed that while overweight/obesity (BMI ≥25) was generally associated with higher CVD prevalence, the association was attenuated in older adults, smokers, and those with diabetes or kidney disease, suggesting illness-related weight loss, frailty, and behavioral confounding. These subgroup insights contextualize the apparent "BMI paradox" observed in the aggregate data. Conclusions: Findings from the BRFSS 2022 highlight both established and emerging determinants of CVD risk, including the modifying effects of comorbidities, social isolation, and BMI-related heterogeneity. Beyond algorithmic performance, these results underscore the value of national surveillance data for informing applied, actionable strategies in CVD prevention and risk stratification.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.