ArticleTrauma case reports2026
Conservative treatment for refracture of the forearm with elastic stable intramedullary nails in situ in an adolescent: A case report.
Article in Trauma case reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Elastic stable intramedullary nailing (ESIN) for forearm shaft fractures in children and adolescents is generally associated with favorable outcomes. However, refracture with ESINs in situ is a rare complication. We report a rare case of refracture with implants in situ in a 14-year-old male patient. Six months after the initial surgery, the patient sustained a reinjury while playing soccer. Radiographs confirmed forearm shaft refracture of both the radius and ulna, and both intramedullary nails were bent at the fracture sites but remained unbroken. We performed emergent closed manual reduction after an ultrasound-guided axillary nerve block and successfully realigned the fractures and straightened the intramedullary nails without breakage. Although exchanging the ESINs was proposed, the patient and his family declined surgery, leading to conservative therapy. Bone union was achieved 2 months after refracture, resulting in a favorable outcome. This minimally invasive treatment is a useful first-line option because it requires no new implants and can be performed in emergency departments or outpatient settings. To our knowledge, this is the first report of this specific treatment in East Asian populations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.