ArticleJournal of patient experience2026
Remote Monitoring in Adults With Congenital Heart Disease: A Patient Experience Study.
Article in Journal of patient experience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Surveillance for long-term complications in adults with congenital heart disease (ACHD) presently relies on outpatient visits. Self-monitoring is increasingly being utilised to reduce the burden of care. This study explores the experiences of ACHD patients undertaking self-monitoring using wearable technology. A prospective observational cohort study was undertaken with ACHD patients across the United Kingdom. A CardiacSense watch recording vital signs and user-initiated electrocardiograms (ECGs) was sent to participants via post. Watch activity was monitored, and participants completed a postmonitoring questionnaire. Fifty-three individuals were screened. Thirty-three eligible participants were sent watches, and 24 (75% female, median age 44.5 years) completed the study. Participants wore watches for 12.3 days (range 1.6-29.8). Younger age was associated with shorter duration of watch-wearing (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.