ArticleAmerican journal of preventive cardiology2026
Immune-mediated inflammatory disease and coronary calcium: Elevated baseline risk and attenuated prognostic gradient.
Article in American journal of preventive cardiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background: Immune-mediated inflammatory diseases (IMID) are associated with accelerated atherosclerosis, yet it is unclear whether CT coronary artery calcium scoring (CTCS) captures this excess cardiovascular risk accurately. We hypothesized that in adults undergoing CTCS, IMID modifies the relationship between coronary artery calcium (CAC) score and incident major adverse cardiac events (MACE). Methods: Among 43,420 individuals in the CLARIFY Registry (University Hospitals Cleveland, 2014-2020) who underwent no-cost CTCS scans, we identified 545 individuals with IMID. After propensity-score matching on age, sex, race, hypertension, diabetes, and smoking status with a 2:1 ratio, 1635 matched individuals were analyzed (545 with IMID and 1090 matched non-IMID controls). CAC was categorized as 0, 1-99, 100-399, ≥400. The primary outcome of 4-point MACE was analyzed over a median 4.2-year follow-up. Cox models tested CAC categories compared to CAC 0, stratified by IMID. Additionally, a log(CAC+1) × IMID interaction term was modeled, to assess whether the risk gradient of CAC differed by IMID status. Results: Individuals with IMID exhibited over twice the MACE incidence of matched controls (40.8 vs 17.6 per 1000 person-years). Among those with zero CAC, those with IMID had a three-fold higher event rate (21.98 vs 7.18 per 1000 person-years). In controls, MACE risk rose stepwise with CAC, quadrupling from CAC 0 to ≥400 (adjusted HR = 4.74; Conclusion: In IMID, baseline risk is elevated even with zero CAC, with attenuation of the traditional CAC-risk gradient observed in non-IMID controls. These findings suggest that, in IMID (1) a CAC score of zero may not guarantee low cardiovascular risk and (2) CAC has less incremental prognostic value than in the general population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.