Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41630948›Full record

ReviewNPJ sustainable agriculture2026

Narrowing farmland biodiversity knowledge gaps with Digital Agriculture.

Ruben Remelgado, Michael Beckmann, Moudrý Vítězslav, Elisa Padulosi, Michela Perrone, Petteri Vihervaara, Christopher Marrs, Anette Eltner, Duccio Rocchini, Anna F Cord

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in NPJ sustainable agriculture, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Ruben RemelgadoAgro-Ecological Modeling Group, Institute of Crop Science and Resource Conservation (INRES), University of Bonn, Niebuhrstraße 1a, Bonn, 53113 Germany.
Michael BeckmannChair of Environmental Planning, Brandenburg University of Technology, Erich-Weinert-Str. 1, Cottbus, 03046 Germany.
Moudrý VítězslavDepartment of Spatial Sciences, Faculty of Environmental Sciences, Czech University of Life Sciences, Kamýcká 129, Prague, 16500 Praha-Suchdol Czech Republic.
Elisa PadulosiDepartment of Spatial Sciences, Faculty of Environmental Sciences, Czech University of Life, Kamýcká 129, Prague, 16500 Praha-Suchdol Czech Republic.
Michela PerroneDepartment of Spatial Sciences, Faculty of Environmental Sciences, Czech University of Life Sciences, Kamýcká 129, Prague, 16500 Praha-Suchdol Czech Republic.
Petteri VihervaaraNature Solutions, Finnish Environment Institute (SYKE), Latokartanonkaari 11, Helsinki, 00790 Finland.
Christopher MarrsInstitute of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, Dresden University of Technology, Helmholtzstr. 10, Dresden, 01069 Germany.
Anette EltnerInstitute of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, Dresden University of Technology, Helmholtzstr. 10, Dresden, 01069 Germany.
Duccio RocchiniDepartment of Spatial Sciences, Faculty of Environmental Sciences, Czech University of Life Sciences, Kamýcká 129, Prague, 16500 Praha-Suchdol Czech Republic.
Anna F CordAgro-Ecological Modeling Group, Institute of Crop Science and Resource Conservation (INRES), University of Bonn, Niebuhrstraße 1a, Bonn, 53113 Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Digital Agriculture - broadly defined as the use of digital technologies and data to manage and optimize agricultural production systems - holds significant but largely untapped potential for biodiversity monitoring. Both fields share many (semi-)automated data collection technologies, analytical methods and workflows, but remain largely disconnected - and are sometimes even perceived as incompatible - in research, education and practice. Here, we explore how existing data streams from Digital Agriculture can directly contribute with primary biodiversity data required by policy-relevant applications, linking them to the Essential Biodiversity Variables framework. We discuss the benefits of this integration, its challenges, and outline pathways for its adoption with respect to ongoing advances in biodiversity science and policy. This integration could improve the precision of biodiversity conservation in farmland, and accelerate transitions to sustainable agriculture - an urgent priority to safeguard nature and its contribution to people.

Indexed as

AgroecologyBiodiversitySustainability

Identifiers

PMID41630948
PMCPMC12860687

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.