Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41630835›Full record

ArticleEuropean urology open science2026

Health-related Quality of Life in Patients Undergoing Ileal Ureter Replacement for Extensive Ureteral Stricture: A Prospective Multi-institutional Study.

Xiang Wang, Derun Li, Kunlin Yang, Jiyu Yang, Guanpeng Han, Yunke Ma, Xinfei Li, Bing Wang, Peng Zhang, Jing Liu and 6 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European urology open science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Xiang WangDepartment of Urology, Institute of Urology and National Urological Cancer Centre, Peking University First Hospital, Peking University, Beijing, China.
Derun LiDepartment of Urology, Institute of Urology and National Urological Cancer Centre, Peking University First Hospital, Peking University, Beijing, China.
Kunlin YangDepartment of Urology, Institute of Urology and National Urological Cancer Centre, Peking University First Hospital, Peking University, Beijing, China.
Jiyu YangDepartment of Urology, Institute of Urology and National Urological Cancer Centre, Peking University First Hospital, Peking University, Beijing, China.
Guanpeng HanDepartment of Urology, Institute of Urology and National Urological Cancer Centre, Peking University First Hospital, Peking University, Beijing, China.
Yunke MaDepartment of Urology, Institute of Urology and National Urological Cancer Centre, Peking University First Hospital, Peking University, Beijing, China.
Xinfei LiDepartment of Urology, Institute of Urology and National Urological Cancer Centre, Peking University First Hospital, Peking University, Beijing, China.
Bing WangDepartment of Urology, Institute of Urology and National Urological Cancer Centre, Peking University First Hospital, Peking University, Beijing, China.
Peng ZhangDepartment of Urology, Emergency General Hospital, Beijing, China.
Jing LiuDepartment of Urology, Beijing Jiangong Hospital, Beijing, China.
Hongjian ZhuDepartment of Urology, Beijing Jiangong Hospital, Beijing, China.
Hua GuanDepartment of Urology, Institute of Urology and National Urological Cancer Centre, Peking University First Hospital, Peking University, Beijing, China.
Zhihua LiDepartment of Urology, Institute of Urology and National Urological Cancer Centre, Peking University First Hospital, Peking University, Beijing, China.
Liqun ZhouDepartment of Urology, Institute of Urology and National Urological Cancer Centre, Peking University First Hospital, Peking University, Beijing, China.
Kai ZhangDepartment of Urology, Institute of Urology and National Urological Cancer Centre, Peking University First Hospital, Peking University, Beijing, China.
Xuesong LiDepartment of Urology, Institute of Urology and National Urological Cancer Centre, Peking University First Hospital, Peking University, Beijing, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and objective: Ileal ureter replacement (IUR) is the definitive management approach for extensive ureteral strictures (UrSs). Patients with UrS exhibit poor health-related quality of life (HRQoL). We conducted a long-term, multi-institutional evaluation of patients who underwent IUR to assess its durable safety and efficacy, as well as postoperative recovery of HRQoL. Methods: A prospective multicenter study (January 2020-July 2022) enrolled patients with an extensive UrS scheduled for IUR. Participants completed the 36-item Short Form Survey (SF-36) before and at 6 mo and 12 mo after surgery. A significant HRQoL improvement was defined as an increase of ≥10 points from baseline. Key findings and limitations: Overall, 82 consecutive patients who underwent IUR were evaluated. The mean age of the cohort was 44.6 yr, and 52/82 (63.4%) were female. During median follow-up of 48 mo, one patient experienced radiographic reobstruction, and eight patients had Clavien-Dindo grade III-IV complications. There was a significant decrease in serum creatinine after surgery ( Conclusions and clinical implications: Our study confirms the safety and efficacy of IUR for complex ureteral reconstruction. IUR was associated with favorable HRQoL improvements within 12 mo in most domains. Patient summary: We looked at changes in quality of life for patients who had surgery that used a piece of bowel tissue to repair a complex urinary blockage. Most patients reported a substantial improvement in their quality of life within 12 months. Our findings support use of this surgical procedure as an effective option when simpler treatments fail.

Indexed as

Ileal ureterQuality of lifeReconstructive surgical proceduresRobot-assisted surgeryUreteral stricture

Identifiers

PMID41630835
PMCPMC12860627

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.