ArticleTechnical innovations & patient support in radiation oncology2026
Time toxicity in CBCT-guided radiation therapy: A retrospective analysis of unplanned imaging burden across disease sites.
Article in Technical innovations & patient support in radiation oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Time toxicity in cancer care: a systematic review of definitions and measurement methods.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026Pooled it
- Online adaptive radiotherapy: International strategies for AI-enabled workflow efficiency and radiation therapist-led delivery for sustainable practice.Technical innovations & patient support in radiation oncology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: Adaptive radiotherapy (ART) enhances treatment precision by adjusting for anatomical changes identified during a course of treatment. While ART is resource-intensive, non-adaptive workflows may also incur significant time and resource burden due to reactive interventions. This study aims to quantify the time-related burden of unplanned activities in non-adaptive CBCT-guided radiation therapy and assess their impact on patients and departmental efficiency. Methods and Materials: A retrospective analysis was conducted on 300 patients treated with CBCT-guided radiation therapy across 20 treatment techniques, encompassing 6,887 treatment fractions. Unplanned activities-including repeated CBCT acquisitions, aborted treatment sessions, additional CT scans, and mid-course replanning-were identified through electronic medical records and imaging logs. Time burden was estimated using electronic medical record timestamps. Results: Repeated CBCTs occurred in 55% of patients, contributing to 201.9 h of additional imaging time. Pelvic disease sites, particularly bladder and gynecologic cancers, exhibited the highest frequency of repeat imaging. Six patients required rescheduling due to unresolved anatomical discrepancies, and 15 underwent treatment plan modifications, with nine requiring repeat planning CTs. The average additional time per affected fraction was 13 min (range: 2-219 min), with some sessions extending beyond 3 h. Conclusions: Non-adaptive CBCT-guided workflows can lead to substantial time toxicity, comparable to or exceeding the resource demands of ART. These findings underscore the need for improved documentation, selective ART implementation, and workflow optimization to enhance patient experience and institutional efficiency.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.