ArticleJournal of clinical medicine research2026
Predicting Breast Imaging-Reporting and Data System Classification of Palpable Breast Masses Using Ultrasound to Prioritize Mammography Queues.
Article in Journal of clinical medicine research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Breast cancer is the leading cause of cancer death in women worldwide. Breast imaging, usually mammography and/or ultrasound, is classified using the Breast Imaging-Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS). At Lampang Hospital, mammography delays of up to 5 months postpone diagnosis in 40% of breast cancer cases. An urgent queue for palpable breast masses was introduced, but nearly half were benign, leading to inefficient prioritization. This study aimed to develop a two-step model based on high-risk ultrasound features and compare it with reference BI-RADS classifications. Methods: This diagnostic prediction study collected retrospective data from Lampang Hospital between January 2021 and December 2023. Ultrasound images of 390 patients were independently reviewed by radiologists blinded to the reference BI-RADS classification. Stepwise multivariable risk difference regression analysis was applied to identify predictive characteristics from seven predefined ultrasound findings. Results: Three predictive characteristics were identified: shape, margin, and echo pattern. The two-step model showed excellent discrimination, with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AuROC) of 0.9801 (95% CI, 0.9696-0.9907) in step 1 and 0.9623 (95% CI, 0.9411-0.9835) in step 2. Internal validation with 200 bootstrap cycles confirmed minimal optimism. Using prevalence-based cut points, the model achieved 88.5% accuracy, with 6.7% underestimation in BI-RADS 4-5 (predicted as 3) and overestimation not exceeding 3% in any category. Conclusions: A two-step ultrasound-based model using shape, margin, and echo pattern demonstrated excellent discrimination as well as high accuracy, with slightly increased underestimation and minimal overestimation. This re-scheduling strategy optimizes mammography queue prioritization, but external validation is required before clinical implementation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.