Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41630822›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical medicine research2026

Predicting Breast Imaging-Reporting and Data System Classification of Palpable Breast Masses Using Ultrasound to Prioritize Mammography Queues.

Sarisa Thinyu, Thanin Lokeskrawee, Takumi Sakata, Natthaphon Pruksathorn, Suppachai Lawanaskol, Jayanton Patumanond, Suwapim Chanlaor, Wanwisa Bumrungpagdee, Chawalit Lakdee

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical medicine research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Sarisa ThinyuDepartment of Radiology, Lampang Hospital, Lampang 52000, Thailand.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0004-5831-4747
Thanin LokeskraweeDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Lampang Hospital, Lampang 52000, Thailand.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1808-2086
Takumi SakataFaculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Yamaguchi University, 1-1-1 Minami-Kogushi, Ube, Yamaguchi 755-8505, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0009-3855-2621
Natthaphon PruksathornDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Lampang Hospital, Lampang 52000, Thailand.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0007-2030-9995
Suppachai LawanaskolChaiprakarn Hospital, Chiang Mai 50320, Thailand.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9846-1491
Jayanton PatumanondClinical Epidemiology and Clinical Statistics Unit, Faculty of Medicine, Naresuan University, Phitsanulok 65000, Thailand.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8977-2995
Suwapim ChanlaorDepartment of Radiology, Buddhachinaraj Phitsanulok Hospital, Phitsanulok 65000 Thailand.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0008-8891-7708
Wanwisa BumrungpagdeeDepartment of Radiology, Buddhachinaraj Phitsanulok Hospital, Phitsanulok 65000 Thailand.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0000-0074-1149
Chawalit LakdeeDepartment of Radiology, Buddhachinaraj Phitsanulok Hospital, Phitsanulok 65000 Thailand.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0008-2554-297X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Breast cancer is the leading cause of cancer death in women worldwide. Breast imaging, usually mammography and/or ultrasound, is classified using the Breast Imaging-Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS). At Lampang Hospital, mammography delays of up to 5 months postpone diagnosis in 40% of breast cancer cases. An urgent queue for palpable breast masses was introduced, but nearly half were benign, leading to inefficient prioritization. This study aimed to develop a two-step model based on high-risk ultrasound features and compare it with reference BI-RADS classifications. Methods: This diagnostic prediction study collected retrospective data from Lampang Hospital between January 2021 and December 2023. Ultrasound images of 390 patients were independently reviewed by radiologists blinded to the reference BI-RADS classification. Stepwise multivariable risk difference regression analysis was applied to identify predictive characteristics from seven predefined ultrasound findings. Results: Three predictive characteristics were identified: shape, margin, and echo pattern. The two-step model showed excellent discrimination, with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AuROC) of 0.9801 (95% CI, 0.9696-0.9907) in step 1 and 0.9623 (95% CI, 0.9411-0.9835) in step 2. Internal validation with 200 bootstrap cycles confirmed minimal optimism. Using prevalence-based cut points, the model achieved 88.5% accuracy, with 6.7% underestimation in BI-RADS 4-5 (predicted as 3) and overestimation not exceeding 3% in any category. Conclusions: A two-step ultrasound-based model using shape, margin, and echo pattern demonstrated excellent discrimination as well as high accuracy, with slightly increased underestimation and minimal overestimation. This re-scheduling strategy optimizes mammography queue prioritization, but external validation is required before clinical implementation.

Indexed as

BI-RADSBreast neoplasmsEarly detection of cancerMammary ultrasonographyMammography

Identifiers

PMID41630822
PMCPMC12861517

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.