ArticleOpen veterinary journal2025
Antibiotic resistance of
Article in Open veterinary journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The incidence of bacterial resistance is a serious global health concern because it reduces the effectiveness of antibiotics and complicates the treatment of infectious diseases. Mastitis is one of the most common and economically significant diseases in the dairy industry, leading to reduced milk yield, altered milk quality, and financial losses for farmers. Antibiotics are commonly used for mastitis treatment, but their excessive or inappropriate use can accelerate the development of antimicrobial resistance (AMR). Aim: This study investigated the antimicrobial resistance of Methods: Exploratory laboratory research was conducted using purposive sampling. Milk samples from lactating Holstein Friesian dairy cows were screened for subclinical mastitis using the California mastitis test (CMT). Samples with CMT scores of +++ and ++++ were processed for Results: A total of 29 milk samples were examined; 17 (58.6%) samples tested positive for subclinical mastitis. Among the 17 subclinical mastitis-positive samples, 4 (23.5%) were positive for Conclusion: The antibiotic resistance patterns observed in
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.