ArticleOpen veterinary journal2025
Assessing the dosage and application strategies of
Article in Open veterinary journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Honey bees Aim: This study aims to determine the efficiency of the volatile oil of Methods: Intwo ways. The first step is to smoke a piece of burlap saturated with eucalyptus oil in a chimney at a concentration of 5 ml/hive. Smoke is applied from the hive door in ten regular bursts per hive in succession. The second method is the evaporation of eucalyptus oil using a bobbin connected to a dry battery. The following concentrations were used 1 ml oil, 1.5 ml oil, a mixture of (0.5 + 1) and (1 + 0.5) ml oil and alcohol, and 1.5 ml alcohol. The mites that fall are counted after 1 and 24 hours of application. Results: When smoking, it gave an average effectiveness of 57.3%, while reached 5 for the control transaction with significant differences at a probability level of 0.01, while the coil method gave the average effectiveness reached 85.3% when fumigating the hive by 1.5 ml of (0.5 ml Eucalyptus oil + 1 ml alcohol). At the level of 0.01, significant differences were observed between this method and the control, which amounted to 22.2. It is observed when using a lower concentration of eucalyptus oil by adding an amount of alcohol. The results confirm that the oil maintained its effectiveness in reducing the waste of used oil. The effectiveness reached 90.1% when fumigating the hive with a concentration of 1.5 eucalyptus oil, 87.8% when mixing 0.5 ml of alcohol with 1 ml of oil, and 73.4% when mixing 0.5 ml of oil with 1 ml of alcohol. The average effectiveness reached 43.1% for the control, 1.5 ml of alcohol. Significant differences were also observed between the treatments and the control with alcohol at a probability of 0.01. Conclusion: These results confirm the possibility of using Eucalyptus oil as a natural product that is safe for bees to combat
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.