Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41630739›Full record

ArticleOpen veterinary journal2025

Parasitological survey of

Dante Dorian Ramírez Castillo, Ángel Canales Gutiérrez

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Open veterinary journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Dante Dorian Ramírez CastilloLaboratorio de Parasitología Veterinaria Facultad de Medicina Veterinaria y Zootecnia, Universidad Nacional del Altiplano de Puno, Puno, Peru.
Ángel Canales GutiérrezPrograma de Ecología, Escuela Profesional de Biología, Universidad Nacional del Altiplano de Puno, Puno, Peru.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Aim: This study aimed to assess the prevalence and larval stages of Methods: A total of 300 fecal samples were randomly collected from nine parks in Puno. The samples were processed using centrifugal flotation. To evaluate differences in prevalence and larval stages among the different zones, Mann-Whitney U and Kruskal-Wallis tests were used. Additionally, Principal component analysis (PCA) and clustering analysis were performed to explore spatial patterns and associations among variables. Results: The highest prevalence of Conclusion:

Indexed as

AncylostomaAncylostomiasisDog DiseasesToxocara canisToxocariasisAnimalsDogsFecesLarvaParks, RecreationalPeruPrevalenceAncylostomaFecesParkPrevalenceToxocara

Identifiers

PMID41630739
PMCPMC12861447

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.