ArticleOpen veterinary journal2025
Preliminary estimate of reference intraocular pressure values in eastern barred bandicoots (
Article in Open veterinary journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The Eastern Barred Bandicoot ( Aim: This study aimed to provide preliminary reference values for intraocular pressures in EBBs. Methods: 13 EBBs from a wild population on French Island, Victoria were humanely trapped and examined with light local restraint. All animals were healthy and had no detectable surface ocular pathology on slit exam biomicroscopy. The intraocular pressure (IOP) was estimated using a rebound tonometer (Tonovet) without topical anesthesia on the "d" setting. Only readings within an acceptable standard deviation were recorded. All EBBs examined tolerated the procedure well. Results: Intraocular pressures were measured in 26 eyes of 13 EBBs. The median was 10 mmHg with an interquartile range of 9-11.8mmHg. The mean and standard deviation range of the IOPs in all EBBs examined was10.2 ± 1.9 mmHg (95%CI: 9.54-10.96 mmHg). No significant differences were observed between the left and right eyes ( Conclusion: This study contributes toward a better understanding of ocular physiology in this species, which can aid in population health management and improve ocular disease screening.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.