Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41630732›Full record

ArticleOpen veterinary journal2025

Environmental fungal contamination on the fur of healthy captive meerkats: Implications for human health.

Vena Chupia, Witaya Suriyasathaporn, Raksiri Nomsiri, Prapawadee Pirintr

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Open veterinary journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Vena ChupiaFaculty of Veterinary Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand.
Witaya SuriyasathapornFaculty of Veterinary Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand.
Raksiri NomsiriChiang Mai Night Safari, Chiang Mai, Thailand.
Prapawadee PirintrFaculty of Veterinary Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Meerkats ( Aim: To identify dermatophytes and other fungal species present on the skin and fur of meerkats at Chiang Mai Night Safari, Chiang Mai, Thailand, in 2022, which may have implications for human health. Methods: Skin and fur samples were collected from 21 meerkats using the brushing/McKenzie technique. Samples were cultured on Sabouraud dextrose agar at 25°C for 14 days. Fungal identification was based on both macroscopic characteristics (colony morphology, color, and texture) and microscopic features observed in lactophenol cotton blue-stained teased mount preparations. This study aimed to detect dermatophytes and identify other potential fungal contaminants at the genus level. Results: No dermatophytes were detected. However, various other fungi, including Conclusion: Predominant fungal contamination was observed on the skin and fur of meerkats. Some identified fungal species are associated with diseases in humans, which can vary in severity based on immune status. Therefore, keeping meerkats as pets is not recommended in homes with children, older adults, or immunocompromised individuals.

Indexed as

Animal FurFungiHerpestidaeAnimalsAnimals, ZooArthrodermataceaeHumansSkinThailandCaptive wildlifeDermatophytesEnvironmental monitoringFungal ContaminationOpportunistic fungi

Identifiers

PMID41630732
PMCPMC12861507

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.