Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41630715›Full record

ArticleOpen veterinary journal2025

The ameliorative effects of

Ertika Fitri Lisnanti, Widya Paramita Lokapirnasari, Mohammad Anam Al-Arif, Eka Pramyrtha Hestianah, Sri Hidanah, Ikechukwu Benjamin Moses, M Gandul Atik Yuliani, Zein Ahmad Baihaqi, Fidi Nur Aini Eka Puji Dameanti, Aswin Rafif Khairullah and 2 more

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Open veterinary journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Comparative effects ofVeterinary world · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Ertika Fitri LisnantiDoctoral Program of Veterinary Science, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Universitas Airlangga, Surabaya, Indonesia.
Widya Paramita LokapirnasariDivision of Animal Husbandry, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Universitas Airlangga, Surabaya, Indonesia.
Mohammad Anam Al-ArifDivision of Animal Husbandry, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Universitas Airlangga, Surabaya, Indonesia.
Eka Pramyrtha HestianahDivision of Veterinary Anatomy, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Universitas Airlangga, Surabaya, Indonesia.
Sri HidanahDivision of Animal Husbandry, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Universitas Airlangga, Surabaya, Indonesia.
Ikechukwu Benjamin MosesDepartment of Applied Microbiology, Faculty of Science, Ebonyi State University, Abakaliki, Nigeria.
M Gandul Atik YulianiDivision of Basic Veterinary Medicine, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Universitas Airlangga, Surabaya, Indonesia.
Zein Ahmad BaihaqiProgram of Animal Husbandry, Faculty of Agriculture, Universitas Islam Kadiri, Kediri, Indonesia.
Fidi Nur Aini Eka Puji DameantiLaboratory of Veterinary Microbiology and Immunology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Universitas Brawijaya, Malang, Indonesia.
Aswin Rafif KhairullahResearch Center for Veterinary Science, National Research and Innovation Agency (BRIN), Bogor, Indonesia.
Viski Fitri HendrawanDepartment of Veterinary Reproduction, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Universitas Brawijaya, Malang, Indonesia.
Saifur RehmanDepartment of Pathobiology, Faculty of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, Gomal University, Dera Ismail Khan, Pakistan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Broiler livestock supports the fulfillment of animal protein in a country where the meat price is affordable for the wider population. However, its progress faces numerous challenges, with colibacillosis, induced by APEC, being a significant concern due to its detrimental impact on production levels, as evidenced by elevated morbidity and mortality rates. Exploring natural antibacterial substances, such as ant nest extracts, presents promising avenues for combating APEC. Aim: This study investigated the potential of Methods: The effects of varying concentrations of Results: Results showed that 15% extract improved FCR by 1.47%, while 30% extract further boosted feed intake and weight gain. Infusion treatments also demonstrated positive effects: the 20 ml infusion improved FCR and stabilized leukocyte and platelet counts, while the 10 ml infusion enhanced overall performance, reduced blood urea nitrogen (BUN) levels, and positively impacted lipid profiles. Conclusion:

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsChickensEscherichia coli InfectionsGrowth SubstancesPoultry DiseasesAnimal FeedAnimalsDietEscherichia coliRubiaceaeAnti-Bacterial AgentsGrowth SubstancesAntibiotic growth promoterBroilerFeed additiveMyrmecodia sp

Identifiers

PMID41630715
PMCPMC12861475

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.