ArticleInternational journal of cardiology. Cardiovascular risk and prevention2026
The effect of COVID-19 pandemic on admission, management and mortality of pulmonary embolism in cancer patients.
Article in International journal of cardiology. Cardiovascular risk and prevention, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Contemporary national trends in the management of admissions for pulmonary embolism.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Pulmonary embolism (PE) is a leading cause of morbidity among cancer patients. The COVID-19 pandemic introduced new challenges to healthcare delivery. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on PE-related hospitalizations, treatment, and in-hospital outcomes in patients with active cancer. Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis using the National Inpatient Sample database from 2016 to 2021. Patients with active cancer and a primary diagnosis of acute PE were categorized into three groups: pre-COVID-19 (2016-2019), peak COVID-19 (2020), and ongoing COVID-19 (2021). We compared baseline characteristics, in-hospital procedures, and clinical outcomes among these groups. Multivariable logistic regression was employed to assess associations between COVID-19 periods and outcomes. Results: Among 170,630 patients with PE and cancer, admission rates decreased during the pandemic. Patients hospitalized during the COVID-19 pandemic more frequently presented with severe PE phenotypes, including saddle PE (9.7 % and 9.4 % vs. 7.5 %, p < 0.001) and acute cor pulmonale (8.4 % and 8.9 % vs. 5.9 %, p < 0.001). Thrombolysis-based therapies increased during the pandemic, whereas adjusted odds of catheter-directed embolectomy were lower. Despite more severe presentations, in-hospital mortality remained relatively stable (6.0 % pre-COVID-19, 6.0 % peak, 5.5 % ongoing; p = 0.004). Conclusion: The COVID-19 pandemic led to decreased PE-related hospitalizations among cancer patients but was associated with more severe presentations and shifts in therapeutic strategies. Notably, in-hospital mortality remained stable, which may be consistent with maintained PE care pathways during the pandemic. These findings highlight the need for robust, adaptable healthcare systems to ensure continuity of care for high-risk populations during global health crises.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.