Observational studySouth African family practice : official journal of the South African Academy of Family Practice/Primary Care2026
Emergency medical services in the Limpopo province: Is there a need for change and is trauma different?
Observational study in South African family practice : official journal of the South African Academy of Family Practice/Primary Care, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPrehospital emergency medical services (EMS) may reduce morbidity and mortality. Trauma systems may improve survival. The objectives of this study were to determine response times of primary and secondary calls in the Limpopo province and to compare primary and secondary calls with international and South African standards. The goal is to make recommendations on improving policies governing the transportation of emergency patients, specifically addressing the transfer of major and polytrauma patients to tertiary facilities.
methodsA retrospective observational cross-sectional study of EMS transports to and from three EMS stations in the Limpopo province between 01 January 2020 and 31 December 2020. Data collection included demographics, medical category of patients, response, patient treatment and mission times.
resultsThe study included 1040 patients, with a similar distribution of male to female, most (62%) aged between 16 and 54 years. Medical cases constituted 30.5%, followed by maternity (25.6%), then trauma (20.7%). Primary calls constituted 79.9%, while secondary calls encompassed 20.1%. The mean response time of all patients was 28 min. The mean response time for trauma patients was 40 min, while for non-trauma patients, it was 24 min. In linear regression analysis, the type of call was found to be statistically significant in predicting response time with a p-value of 0.022.
conclusionThe mean response time overall and for trauma is far longer than international standards and longer than for non-trauma patients. Efforts should aim to reduce response time for trauma patients.Contribution: The research highlights the difference in response between trauma and non-trauma cases in a rural setting.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.