Observational studyEuropean journal of anaesthesiology2026
Blood pressure thresholds for the administration of balanced crystalloids and the effect on intra-operative hypotension: A proof-of-concept causal inference analysis featuring idealised dynamic treatment regimens.
Observational study in European journal of anaesthesiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundHaemodynamic management and fluid administration constitute a challenging cornerstone of intra-operative care to counteract hypotension. Observational studies remain a vital source of evidence regarding the associations of fluids and vasopressors with peri-operative outcomes.
objectiveTo evaluate dynamic treatment regimens (DTRs) of balanced crystalloids on the incidence of intra-operative hypotension. DTRs constitute a statistical framework to evaluate the causal impact of different treatment strategies (e.g. fluid administration) on an outcome (e.g. hypotension) whilst accounting for time-dependent treatments and treatment-confounder feedbacks.
designAnalysis of observational data using modern causal inference methods.
settingTertiary institution in South Korea during January 2011 to December 2020 (INSPIRE dataset). PATIENTS: N = 23 305 patients undergoing elective surgery under general anaesthesia.
interventionsThe DTRs refer to thresholds of mean invasive arterial blood pressure (MAP) to guide a hypothetical administration of 250 ml of balanced crystalloids. As example, a DTR implies administering 250 ml of balanced crystalloids if MAP drops below a 70 mmHg threshold, and to administer no crystalloids otherwise. MAP thresholds of 60, 65, 70 and 75 mmHg were evaluated.
main outcome measuresPrimary endpoint was intra-operative hypotension defined as a MAP below 65 mmHg averaged in 15-min windows.
resultsThe DTRs resulted in clinically similar incidences of intra-operative hypotension for surgeries shorter than 2 h. For surgeries lasting longer, the DTRs with early fluid administration resulted in a reduction of hypotension of more than 4% towards the end of the surgery. As higher MAP-thresholds imply higher amounts of fluid, our findings suggest there is in general a positive effect of fluid administration on intra-operative hypotension.
conclusionsUsing modern causal inference methods, we demonstrated the clinical utility of idealised DTRs to study the impact of time-dependent haemodynamic management on the incidence of intra-operative hypotension in idealised settings. Future studies are required to investigate more complex DTRs mirroring clinical practice and to assess the robustness of the findings with respect to the different surgical populations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.