ArticleClinical chemistry and laboratory medicine2026
Antiphosphatidylserine/prothrombin antibodies define a high-risk antiphospholipid syndrome profile associated with organ damage.
Article in Clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Autoantibody repertoire in lupus nephritis: from pathogenic mechanisms to clinical integration for precision decision-making.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesAntiphosphatidylserine/prothrombin (aPS/PT) antibodies are promising non-criteria aPLs associated with antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) manifestations. Their influence on long-term outcomes and damage remains uncertain. To assess aPS/PT antibodies association with accrual damage and severe APS disease phenotypes, focusing on their potential for risk stratification.
methodsThis single-centre cohort study involved 163 patients who fulfilled the 2023 ACR/EULAR APS criteria. IgG/IgM aPS/PT, aCL, and anti-β2GPI antibodies were measured by commercial ELISA. Lupus anticoagulant (LA) was detected in accordance with the ISTH-SSC recommendation. Clinical data covered macrovascular, microvascular, obstetric, and hematologic manifestations. Damage was assessed using DIAPS.
resultsaPS/PT IgG and IgM were positive in 46.0 % and 65.6 %, respectively. aPS/PT IgG positivity was linked to microvascular involvement (58.7 % vs. 34.1 %, p=0.002), obstetric APS (57.4 % vs. 24.6 %, p<0.0001), valvular disease (17.3 % vs. 4.6 %, p=0.008), and thrombocytopenia (37.3 % vs. 12.5 %, p<0.0001). aPS/PT IgM positivity was also associated with microvascular APS (p=0.006), obstetric morbidity (p=0.02), and thrombocytopenia (p=0.01). In multivariable analysis, quadruple aPL positivity (LA + aCL + anti-β2GPI + aPS/PT) was independently linked to damage (OR 4.3, 95 % CI 1.3-14.5; p=0.02), with no other factors remaining significant.
conclusionsBoth IgG and IgM aPS/PT antibodies are associated with severe APS features, including microvascular and obstetric issues, as well as overall organ damage. Adding aPS/PT to standard aPL tests finds a subgroup of quadruple-positive APS patients at higher risk of damage. These results could help guide personalized APS management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41630553What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.