ArticleVeterinary dermatology2026
Fosmidomycin for the Treatment of Canine Otitis Externa: A Randomised, Double-Blinded, Controlled 'Split Body' Clinical Trial.
Article in Veterinary dermatology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Fosmidomycin for the Treatment of Canine Otitis Externa: A Randomised, Double-Blinded, Controlled 'Split Body' Clinical Trial.Veterinary dermatology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundTargeted antimicrobial therapy for canine otitis externa (OE) represents an opportunity for antimicrobial stewardship. Fosmidomycin selectively inhibits the non-mevalonate pathway for isoprenoid biosynthesis utilised by canine-adapted, and not human-adapted, staphylococci.
objectivesTo evaluate the safety and efficacy of fosmidomycin for treatment of bacterial OE compared with enrofloxacin. ANIMALS: Fifteen client-owned dogs with bilateral bacterial OE were enrolled. MATERIALS AND
methodsFosmidomycin stability in solution for 28 days was confirmed before trial commencement. A 'split body' design was used: each ear canal was randomised to receive a solution of fosmidomycin or enrofloxacin applied twice daily for 28 days, combined with a tapering anti-inflammatory course of oral prednisone. Owners and investigators were blinded to treatments. Dogs were evaluated at Day (D)0, D14 and D28 with clinical scores (0-3 otitis index score [OTIS3], ear cytological results, pain) and owner assessments (pruritus scores for each ear, quality-of-life scores and a hearing questionnaire). On D28, owners and investigators assessed global treatment efficacy for each ear.
resultsTreatment group did not significantly influence clinical scores; cytological scores, OTIS3 scores and pruritus scores significantly improved for both groups over the trial period. Treatment efficacy for both ears was assessed as good-to-excellent by owners and investigators for the majority of dogs. No safety concerns were identified. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Fosmidomycin and enrofloxacin performed comparably for topical treatment of bacterial otitis in this study. Fosmidomycin is a promising targeted antimicrobial for canine bacterial infections while limiting selection for antimicrobial resistance in human pathogens such as Staphylococcus aureus.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.