Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41630498›Full record

ArticleVeterinary dermatology2026

Fosmidomycin for the Treatment of Canine Otitis Externa: A Randomised, Double-Blinded, Controlled 'Split Body' Clinical Trial.

Lindsey E Citron, Darko Stefanovski, Youwen You, Rachel Proctor, Donna Watson, Julie Randall, Christine L Cain

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial, Veterinary
In one paragraph

Article in Veterinary dermatology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Lindsey E CitronDepartment of Clinical Sciences and Advanced Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, School of Veterinary Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0004-4364-2326
Darko StefanovskiDepartment of Clinical Studies-New Bolton Center, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Kennett, Pennsylvania, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4654-0569
Youwen YouDepartment of Clinical Studies-New Bolton Center, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Kennett, Pennsylvania, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3247-1718
Rachel ProctorDepartment of Clinical Studies-New Bolton Center, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Kennett, Pennsylvania, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0001-3013-5921
Donna WatsonMatthew J. Ryan Veterinary Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Julie RandallMatthew J. Ryan Veterinary Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0002-7376-3861
Christine L CainDepartment of Clinical Sciences and Advanced Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, School of Veterinary Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6290-3702

Funding

Morris Animal Foundation D23CA-801University of Pennsylvania School of Veterinary Medicine
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTargeted antimicrobial therapy for canine otitis externa (OE) represents an opportunity for antimicrobial stewardship. Fosmidomycin selectively inhibits the non-mevalonate pathway for isoprenoid biosynthesis utilised by canine-adapted, and not human-adapted, staphylococci.

objectivesTo evaluate the safety and efficacy of fosmidomycin for treatment of bacterial OE compared with enrofloxacin. ANIMALS: Fifteen client-owned dogs with bilateral bacterial OE were enrolled. MATERIALS AND

methodsFosmidomycin stability in solution for 28 days was confirmed before trial commencement. A 'split body' design was used: each ear canal was randomised to receive a solution of fosmidomycin or enrofloxacin applied twice daily for 28 days, combined with a tapering anti-inflammatory course of oral prednisone. Owners and investigators were blinded to treatments. Dogs were evaluated at Day (D)0, D14 and D28 with clinical scores (0-3 otitis index score [OTIS3], ear cytological results, pain) and owner assessments (pruritus scores for each ear, quality-of-life scores and a hearing questionnaire). On D28, owners and investigators assessed global treatment efficacy for each ear.

resultsTreatment group did not significantly influence clinical scores; cytological scores, OTIS3 scores and pruritus scores significantly improved for both groups over the trial period. Treatment efficacy for both ears was assessed as good-to-excellent by owners and investigators for the majority of dogs. No safety concerns were identified. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Fosmidomycin and enrofloxacin performed comparably for topical treatment of bacterial otitis in this study. Fosmidomycin is a promising targeted antimicrobial for canine bacterial infections while limiting selection for antimicrobial resistance in human pathogens such as Staphylococcus aureus.

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsDog DiseasesFosfomycinOtitis ExternaAnimalsDogsDouble-Blind MethodEnrofloxacinFemaleMalePrednisoneTreatment OutcomeAnti-Bacterial AgentsEnrofloxacinFosfomycinPrednisoneantimicrobial resistanceenrofloxacinfosmidomycinotitis externaStaphylococcus

Identifiers

PMID41630498
PMCPMC13167637

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.