Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41630494›Full record

ArticleTurkish journal of surgery2026

Preliminary single-operator experience with ultrasound-guided liver core needle biopsy performed by a supervised general surgery resident.

Wojciech Ciesielski, Konrad Kosztowny, Tomasz Klimczak, Anna Sawina, Paulina Lange, Antoni Knera, Adam Placek, Karol Sadowski, Adam Durczyński, Janusz Strzelczyk and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Turkish journal of surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Wojciech CiesielskiDepartment of General and Transplant Surgery, Medical University of Lodz Faculty of Medicine, Łódź, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-5566-6745
Konrad KosztownyDepartment of General and Transplant Surgery, Medical University of Lodz Faculty of Medicine, Łódź, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-7016-0777
Tomasz KlimczakDepartment of General and Transplant Surgery, Medical University of Lodz Faculty of Medicine, Łódź, Poland.ORCID 0000-0001-7589-1141
Anna SawinaDepartment of General and Transplant Surgery, Medical University of Lodz Faculty of Medicine, Łódź, Poland.ORCID 0000-0003-4942-6128
Paulina LangeDepartment of General and Transplant Surgery, Medical University of Lodz Faculty of Medicine, Łódź, Poland.ORCID 0009-0005-6345-4047
Antoni KneraDepartment of General and Transplant Surgery, Medical University of Lodz Faculty of Medicine, Łódź, Poland.ORCID 0009-0000-2170-163X
Adam PlacekDepartment of General and Transplant Surgery, Medical University of Lodz Faculty of Medicine, Łódź, Poland.ORCID 0009-0002-5272-9429
Karol SadowskiDepartment of Ophthalmology, Medical University of Lodz Faculty of Medicine, Łódź, Poland.ORCID 0009-0000-0977-4174
Adam DurczyńskiDepartment of General and Transplant Surgery, Medical University of Lodz Faculty of Medicine, Łódź, Poland.ORCID 0000-0003-2999-5454
Janusz StrzelczykDepartment of General and Transplant Surgery, Medical University of Lodz Faculty of Medicine, Łódź, Poland.ORCID 0000-0003-3438-9512
Piotr HogendorfDepartment of General and Transplant Surgery, Medical University of Lodz Faculty of Medicine, Łódź, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-4458-0145

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: Ultrasound-guided core needle biopsy (CNB) is essential for diagnosing liver tumors not amenable to resection, but the outcomes of resident-performed CNB are poorly defined. We evaluated the diagnostic performance and safety of liver CNB performed by a single ultrasound-certified general surgery resident under specialist supervision. Material and Methods: In this retrospective single-center case series, 65 consecutive patients underwent ultrasound-guided liver CNB between July 2022 and January 2025. All procedures constituted the resident's entire initial experience with liver CNB. Diagnostic success was defined as obtaining sufficient tissue for definitive histopathological diagnosis. Predictors of diagnostic success were assessed using univariate analyses and logistic regression. Learning-curve effects were evaluated by comparing early and late tertiles of chronologically ordered cases and by modelling case number as a continuous predictor. The impact of lesion size was examined by subgroup analysis comparing <4 cm and ≥4 cm lesions and by treating the maximal lesion diameter as a continuous variable. Results: Adequate tissue was obtained in 58/65 biopsies (89.2%), with malignancy confirmed in 49 patients (75.4%) and benign lesions in 9 patients (13.8%). Diagnostic success was 85.7% in the early tertile and 95.5% in the late tertile (p=0.345). Logistic regression showed a non-significant trend toward a higher diagnostic yield over time. Neither lesion size (categorized as <4 cm versus ≥4 cm) nor maximal diameter (analyzed as a continuous variable) was significantly associated with diagnostic success. No immediate or clinically overt delayed complications were observed during 24 hours of in-hospital monitoring. Conclusion: This preliminary single-operator experience suggests that, under close supervision, an appropriately trained general surgery resident can perform ultrasound-guided liver CNB with a high diagnostic yield and a low observed complication rate. These hypothesis-generating findings support further multi-operator and comparative studies of resident-performed liver CNB.

Indexed as

Biopsydiagnostic yieldinterventionalliver neoplasms/diagnosismedicalneedleresidentssafetyultrasonography

Identifiers

PMID41630494
PMCPMC12964085

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.