ArticleTurkish journal of surgery2026
Total mesorectal excision quality as a predictor of overall survival in rectal cancer: A retrospective cohort study.
Article in Turkish journal of surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Achieving complete total mesorectal excision (TME) is considered an important indicator of surgical quality in rectal cancer surgery. However, the impact of TME quality on overall survival (OS) remains controversial. This study aimed to evaluate the association between TME quality and OS in patients undergoing rectal cancer surgery. Material and Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on 171 patients who underwent elective low anterior resection or abdominoperineal resection for rectal cancer between 2021 and 2022. OS was compared between patients with incomplete TME and those with near-complete or complete TME. In addition, clinical and pathological factors associated with TME quality were assessed. Results: Incomplete TME was independently associated with worse OS [hazard ratio (HR)=2.53, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.15-5.59, p=0.021], while undergoing a Hartmann procedure showed the strongest negative impact on OS (HR=4.60, 95% CI 2.04-10.38, p<0.001). At 36 months, OS was 86.3% in the near-complete/complete TME group versus 68.3% in the incomplete group (log-rank p=0.008). Factors associated with incomplete TME included lower preoperative albumin levels, larger tumor size, previous abdominal surgery, tumors located closer to the anal verge, lymphovascular invasion, and positive circumferential resection margins. Conclusion: Incomplete TME was associated with significantly worse OS in patients undergoing rectal cancer surgery. These findings highlight the importance of achieving optimal TME quality. Larger prospective studies are warranted to validate these results.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.