Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41630374›Full record

ArticleHealth promotion journal of Australia : official journal of Australian Association of Health Promotion Professionals2026

Length and Framing of Anti-Junk Food Ads Impact Inclinations to Consume Junk Food Among Normal Weight, Overweight, and Adults With Obesity.

Ross C Hollett, Brennen Mills, Stephanie L Godrich, Julia Butt, Gina S A Trapp

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health promotion journal of Australia : official journal of Australian Association of Health Promotion Professionals, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Length and Framing of Anti-Junk Food Ads Impact Inclinations to Consume Junk Food Among Normal Weight, Overweight, and Adults With Obesity.Health promotion journal of Australia : official journal of Australian Association of Health Promotion Professionals · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Ross C HollettPsychology & Criminology, Edith Cowan University, Joondalup, Western Australia, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7146-3879
Brennen MillsSchool of Medical & Health Sciences, Edith Cowan University, Joondalup and Bunbury, Western Australia, Australia.
Stephanie L GodrichSchool of Medical & Health Sciences, Edith Cowan University, Joondalup and Bunbury, Western Australia, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3067-8253
Julia ButtPsychology & Criminology, Edith Cowan University, Joondalup, Western Australia, Australia.
Gina S A TrappSchool of Medical & Health Sciences, Edith Cowan University, Joondalup and Bunbury, Western Australia, Australia.

Funding

Edith Cowan University
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundUnrestricted junk food advertising increases the risk of short-term junk food consumption among viewers. We aimed to estimate the impact of junk food and anti-junk food advertisements differing in length and framing on junk food consumption inclinations.

methodsAdult participants (N = 505) were exposed to a randomly selected junk food advertisement or anti-junk food advertisement and reported their immediate craving and consumption intentions. These responses were separately analysed for two groups based on Body Mass Index (BMI): participants classified as within the normal range (18.5-25), and a combined group with BMI values indicating either overweight (25+) or obesity (30+) (OW/OB). A secondary analysis was also performed on a subgroup (N = 99) who were exposed to an advertisement containing junk food they reportedly enjoy consuming.

resultsFor both BMI groups, junk food advertisement exposure did not increase immediate craving or consumption intentions. However, decreases were observed in craving and consumption intentions following anti-junk food advertisements. A 15-s anti-junk advertisement was more effective than a 30-s anti-junk advertisement for normal weight BMI participants. For OW/OB BMI participants, an anti-junk advertisement encouraging health food was more effective than an anti-junk advertisement criticising junk food.

conclusionsThe effectiveness of anti-junk food advertisements varies depending on the length and framing of the advertisements as well as the viewer's BMI categorisation. These nuances are important for maximising the effectiveness of anti-junk food advertisements in different contexts. SO WHAT?: Given the potential for anti-junk food advertisements to curb consumption, a higher frequency of broadcasting brief positively framed health messages should be considered to mitigate the potential public health risks associated with junk food consumption.

Indexed as

AdvertisingFast FoodsFeeding BehaviorObesityOverweightAdolescentAdultBody Mass IndexCravingFemaleHumansIntentionMaleMedia ExposureMiddle AgedYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID41630374
PMCPMC12865134

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.