Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41630136›Full record

ArticleThe European journal of neuroscience2026

Approach Motivation and Reward Sensitivity: Effects of High-Definition Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (HD-tDCS) to Brain Hemispheres on Effort-Related Cardiovascular Response.

David Framorando, Guido H E Gendolla, Philip A Gable

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The European journal of neuroscience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

David FramorandoGeneva Motivation Lab, FPSE, Section of Psychology, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-4518-4283
Guido H E GendollaGeneva Motivation Lab, FPSE, Section of Psychology, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.
Philip A GableDepartment of Psychology, University of Delaware, Newark, Delaware, USA.

Funding

Swiss National Science Foundation SNF PZ00P1_216471
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study examined the effect of brain hemisphere stimulation on effort intensity. We applied high-definition transcranial direct current stimulation (HD-tDCS) to the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (dlPFC) to manipulate left or right hemispheric activity and assess its impact on cardiovascular responses reflecting effort. In total, 102 participants (65 women, 37 men) performed a mental concentration task under right cathodal, left cathodal, or sham stimulation conditions. We recorded cardiovascular responses, including pre-ejection period (PEP), systolic blood pressure (SBP), heart rate (HR), and diastolic blood pressure (DBP). Preregistered hypotheses predicted right cathodal stimulation to lead to greater left frontal hemispheric activity. This should result in higher effort during a mental concentration task of unclear difficulty by increasing approach motivation and thus success importance. As predicted, right cathodal stimulation increased PEP and SBP reactivity, indicating higher effort compared to the left cathodal and sham stimulation conditions. However, this effect was only evident in women, with men exhibiting a contrasting pattern. Our findings highlight the sex-specific effects of brain stimulation on cardiovascular responses reflecting effort, with the anticipated effects appearing in women.

Indexed as

Blood PressureDorsolateral Prefrontal CortexHeart RateMotivationRewardTranscranial Direct Current StimulationAdultFemaleFunctional LateralityHumansMaleYoung Adultapproach/avoidance motivationeffortpre‐ejection periodtranscranial direct current stimulation (tDCS)

Identifiers

PMID41630136
PMCPMC12865145

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.