Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41630043›Full record

SynthesisScandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine2026

Effectiveness of non-technical skills training for healthcare professionals in emergency departments: a systematic review.

YuKun Zhang, YuWei Wang, ManYu Jiang, XiHui Sun, LiYoong Tang

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Scandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Expanding the framework of non-technical skills in resuscitation: why family communication matters.Scandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

YuKun ZhangDepartment of Nursing, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China.
YuWei WangDepartment of Nursing, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China.
ManYu JiangDepartment of Nursing Science, Faculty of Medicine, Universiti Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
XiHui SunDepartment of Nursing Science, Faculty of Medicine, Universiti Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
LiYoong TangDepartment of Nursing Science, Faculty of Medicine, Universiti Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. liliantang@um.edu.my.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThis systematic review evaluated the effectiveness of non-technical skills (NTS) training for healthcare professionals working in emergency departments (EDs) and assessed the certainty of the evidence.

methodsPeer-reviewed studies of NTS training for ED staff, including physicians, nurses, and allied health professionals, were systematically identified from PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, the Cochrane Library, CINAHL, EMBASE, and PsycINFO, with supplementary searches of Google Scholar and reference lists (search date: 19 August 2025). Eligible studies reported learning outcomes, observed behavioural performance, and/or patient- or process-level outcomes in ED settings. Two reviewers independently screened records, extracted data, and assessed risk of bias using RoB 2 for randomised controlled trials, ROBINS-I for non-randomised comparative studies, and the NIH/NHLBI tool for before-and-after studies. Owing to methodological heterogeneity, findings were synthesised narratively, and certainty of evidence was assessed using the GRADE approach (PROSPERO: CRD420251181995).

resultsOf 6,359 records identified, 15 studies met inclusion criteria, comprising two randomised controlled trials, one quasi-experimental study with a control group, and twelve before-and-after studies, predominantly from single-centre adult EDs in North America, Europe, and Asia. NTS training was commonly delivered through simulation-based courses with structured debriefing and was associated with consistent pre- to post-training improvements in knowledge, teamwork attitudes, and self-confidence, with low to moderate certainty of evidence. Behavioural performance improved across study designs, including more frequent closed-loop communication, clearer role allocation and prioritisation, improved situational awareness, and higher teamwork ratings measured using validated instruments such as the Team Emergency Assessment Measure (TEAM) and the Trauma Non-Technical Skills scale (T-NOTECHS) (moderate certainty). Evidence for clinical or process outcomes was limited but generally favourable in single-centre studies, including shorter resuscitation times and improved protocol adherence; no study reported effects on mortality or complication rates, and the certainty of evidence for these outcomes was rated as low to very low.

conclusionNTS training for ED teams improves learning outcomes and observable team performance, particularly when simulation is combined with high-quality debriefing and brief in-situ refreshers. Evidence for effects on patient outcomes remains limited. Future research should prioritise pragmatic multi-site designs with blinded video-based assessment and pre-specified process and patient endpoints.

Indexed as

Clinical CompetenceEmergency Service, HospitalHealth PersonnelHumansEmergency departmentNon-technical skillsPatient safetySimulation trainingSystematic reviewTeamwork

Identifiers

PMID41630043
PMCPMC12951912

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.