SynthesisScandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine2026
Effectiveness of non-technical skills training for healthcare professionals in emergency departments: a systematic review.
Synthesis in Scandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Non-technical skills in acute care: an umbrella review of assessment, training, and implications for emergency department practice.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Pooled it
- Expanding the framework of non-technical skills in resuscitation: why family communication matters.Scandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesThis systematic review evaluated the effectiveness of non-technical skills (NTS) training for healthcare professionals working in emergency departments (EDs) and assessed the certainty of the evidence.
methodsPeer-reviewed studies of NTS training for ED staff, including physicians, nurses, and allied health professionals, were systematically identified from PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, the Cochrane Library, CINAHL, EMBASE, and PsycINFO, with supplementary searches of Google Scholar and reference lists (search date: 19 August 2025). Eligible studies reported learning outcomes, observed behavioural performance, and/or patient- or process-level outcomes in ED settings. Two reviewers independently screened records, extracted data, and assessed risk of bias using RoB 2 for randomised controlled trials, ROBINS-I for non-randomised comparative studies, and the NIH/NHLBI tool for before-and-after studies. Owing to methodological heterogeneity, findings were synthesised narratively, and certainty of evidence was assessed using the GRADE approach (PROSPERO: CRD420251181995).
resultsOf 6,359 records identified, 15 studies met inclusion criteria, comprising two randomised controlled trials, one quasi-experimental study with a control group, and twelve before-and-after studies, predominantly from single-centre adult EDs in North America, Europe, and Asia. NTS training was commonly delivered through simulation-based courses with structured debriefing and was associated with consistent pre- to post-training improvements in knowledge, teamwork attitudes, and self-confidence, with low to moderate certainty of evidence. Behavioural performance improved across study designs, including more frequent closed-loop communication, clearer role allocation and prioritisation, improved situational awareness, and higher teamwork ratings measured using validated instruments such as the Team Emergency Assessment Measure (TEAM) and the Trauma Non-Technical Skills scale (T-NOTECHS) (moderate certainty). Evidence for clinical or process outcomes was limited but generally favourable in single-centre studies, including shorter resuscitation times and improved protocol adherence; no study reported effects on mortality or complication rates, and the certainty of evidence for these outcomes was rated as low to very low.
conclusionNTS training for ED teams improves learning outcomes and observable team performance, particularly when simulation is combined with high-quality debriefing and brief in-situ refreshers. Evidence for effects on patient outcomes remains limited. Future research should prioritise pragmatic multi-site designs with blinded video-based assessment and pre-specified process and patient endpoints.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.