ArticleGenome biology2026
Functional correction and genome integrity with duplex base editing of β-thalassemic hematopoietic stem cells.
Article in Genome biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Electroporation for High-Efficiency Delivery of CRISPR to Hematopoietic Cells.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2027Article
- Mechanisms underlying disease-causing variants in promoters and enhancers.Nature genetics · 2026Review
- Functional correction and genome integrity with duplex base editing of β-thalassemic hematopoietic stem cells.Genome biology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundBeta-thalassemia is among the most common monogenic disorders, posing a major global health challenge. Editing of genetic modifiers, such as BCL11A erythroid enhancer and HBG promoters, enhances fetal hemoglobin expression and confers major therapeutic potential. Double-strand-break (DSB)-independent genome editing tools, such as base editors (BE), are potentially safer and better suited for multiplexed application than DSB-dependent CRISPR/Cas technology. However, harmful on- and off-target events remain a concern and must be excluded before clinical application, including chromosomal rearrangements invisible to standard detection technologies.
resultsUsing primary patient-derived CD34
conclusionsDuplex BE targeting both BCL11A erythroid enhancer and HBG promoter enables functional correction and genome integrity. Our study highlights the efficacy, safety, and therapeutic potential of the present duplex BE approach.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.