ArticleBMC psychology2026
The effects of relational job characteristics on Chinese public sector employees' proactive service behavior: a moderated mediation model.
Article in BMC psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe proactive service behavior of employees in the public sector has important effects on the public’s perceptions of service quality. However, it has rarely been studied among public sector employees. As job design research has developed, the social and relational aspects of work have been neglected. On the bases of person‒job fit theory and the proactive motivation model, this study explores the influences and mechanisms of two dimensions of relational job characteristics—job impact on service recipients and job contact with service recipients—on Chinese public sector employees’ proactive service behavior. Specifically, it examines the mediating role of work calling. In addition, it explores public service motivation as a moderator of the relationships between relational job characteristics and work calling.
methodsThis study adopted a cross-sectional survey design. 342 questionnaires were collected using the paid sampling service of the Questionnaire Star, of which 330 (96.49%) were valid. The participants’ relational job characteristics, public service motivation, work calling, and proactive service behavior were measured. SPSS was used for descriptive statistical analysis and correlation analysis. Path analysis with observable variables was conducted to test the hypotheses using Mplus.
resultsThe results indicated that job impact and job contact were positively associated with public sector employees’ proactive service behavior (B1 = 0.099, p < 0.01; B2 = 0.081, p < 0.01) and that work calling mediated the effects of job impact and job contact on proactive service behavior (B1 = 0.032, p < 0.05; B2 = 0.038, p < 0.01). Public service motivation moderated the relationship between job impact and work calling (B = 0.091, p < 0.05) and the mediating effect of work calling between job impact and proactive service behavior.
conclusionsOur findings highlight that relational job characteristics and work calling are key antecedents of proactive service behavior, with public service motivation amplifying the positive effects of job impact. In practice, these findings demonstrate that public sector organizations can improve employees’ proactive service behavior through optimizing job design to reinforce relational elements and nurturing work calling and PSM via recruitment, training, and supportive organizational settings. These strategies collectively contribute to building a more efficient and citizen-centric service-oriented government.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.