ArticleCancer cell international2026
Personalized chemotherapy guided by drug sensitivity of circulating tumor cells improves outcomes in advanced biliary tract cancer.
Article in Cancer cell international, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Biliary tract carcinoma (BTC) is an aggressive cancer with a poor prognosis, and chemotherapy's effectiveness is limited, especially after first-line therapy failure. Circulating tumor cells (CTCs) offer a promising platform for in vitro drug-sensitivity testing to optimize subsequent-line chemotherapy, but the clinical efficacy and prognostic value remain underexplored. In this study, we retrospectively analyzed 85 advanced BTC patients, with 25 receiving CTC-based drug-sensitivity-guided chemotherapy (CSBT), 15 receiving FOLFOX based chemotherapy, and 45 receiving empirical therapy. CTCs were enriched and tested for drug sensitivity using a glucose uptake assay. Therapeutic efficacy, including patient response, progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and toxicity profiles, was evaluated. The results indicated that the objective response rate (ORR) was 16% in CSBT, 6.7% in FOLFOX, and 4.4% in the empirical group. The disease control rate (DCR) was significantly higher in CSBT group (56%) compared to the FOLFOX (20%) and empirical therapy (22.2%; p < 0.05) groups. Median PFS (mPFS) was significantly prolonged in the CSBT group (5.4 months) versus the FOLFOX (1.9 months) and empirical therapy (2.7 months; p < 0.05) groups. Median OS (mOS) was extended in the CSBT group (12 months) compared with the FOLFOX (5.1 months) and EBT group (7.8 months), with a significant improvement during the first year of treatment (p < 0.05). Toxicity profiles were similar across all groups. This study demonstrates, for the first time, that CTC-based drug sensitivity testing offers a potential strategy to guide subsequent anti-cancer therapy for advanced BTC, providing a safe and effective approach to improving patient prognosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.