ArticleBMC medical education2026
Training peer supporters in a single-centre medical school: a mixed-methods evaluation using Kirkpatrick's Four-Level model.
Article in BMC medical education, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundMedical students face high levels of psychological distress but often hesitate to seek formal support. Peer support programmes offer a student-centred approach to fostering well-being and resilience. This study examines the educational impact of the Ramathibodi Peer Support Programme (Rama PSP), a student-led initiative in Thailand, with a focus on the development of peer supporters.
methodThirty-seven medical students across all six years participated in a 10-week training programme. A mixed-methods design was employed, guided by Kirkpatrick’s Four-Level Model of Training Evaluation. Quantitative data were collected using the mid- and end-course assessments, Rama PSP aptitude assessment, PHQ-9 and GAD-7. Qualitative data were obtained through post-training interviews and analysed using content analysis.
resultsPeer supporters demonstrated self-reported significant improvements in key competencies, including clarifying questions, referrals and boundary-setting. No significant changes were observed in PHQ-9 and GAD-7 levels, consistent with the programme’s educational–not therapeutic–focus. Qualitative findings revealed substantial growth in self-awareness (96.2%), self-esteem, self-management and social awareness. Peer supporters reported applying their skills in both formal and informal peer interactions.
conclusionsRama PSP suggests that structured peer support training may be associated with perceived improvements in interpersonal competencies and developmental outcomes among medical students. By focusing on peer supporters, the programme may support professional identity formation and complement traditional curricula. Integrating such training could help foster empathy, resilience and a supportive learning environment; however, further research using objective measures is needed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.