SynthesisBMC medicine2026
Early gestational prediction of spontaneous preterm birth using a validated three-protein serum biomarker panel.
Synthesis in BMC medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
32 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundSpontaneous preterm birth (sPTB) remains a major contributor to neonatal morbidity and mortality, with limited reliable early prediction tools. Existing biomarkers, such as the insulin-like growth factor-binding protein 4 (IBP4) to sex hormone-binding globulin (SHBG) ratio, offer modest predictive performance and are restricted to mid-gestation use (18-20 weeks), limiting their utility for timely intervention. We aimed to develop and validate a novel serological test based on early-gestational sampling to predict the risk of sPTB.
methodsWe conducted a meta-analysis of 18 placental transcriptomic datasets to identify candidate genes associated with sPTB, resulting in 21 protein candidates tested by targeted proteomics. We developed a three-protein panel (glutathione peroxidase 3, GPX3; nidogen-1, NID1; and pappalysin-2, PAPPA2) and validated it in four independent cohorts (456 subjects and 1048 serum specimens) from the USA and Asia. Longitudinal serum samples were collected from 5 weeks and were analyzed using mass spectrometry and ELISA platforms. Predictor performance was compared to the IBP4/SHBG ratio.
resultsThe three-protein predictor (GPX3, NID1, and PAPPA2) demonstrated reproducible and superior performance across cohorts: AUC 0.74 (95% CI 0.59-0.88) in Alabama, 0.93 (95% CI 0.88-0.99) in California, 0.80 (95% CI 0.75-0.85) in Asia 1, and 0.83 (95% CI 0.70-0.95) in Asia 2. This outperformed the IBP4/SHBG ratio, which achieved AUCs of 0.68 (95% CI 0.50-0.89), 0.77 (95% CI 0.67-0.88), 0.59 (95% CI 0.52-0.65), and 0.61 (95% CI 0.50-0.75), respectively. Across obstetric trimesters, the three-protein panel maintained high predictive accuracy in the first and second trimesters (AUROC 0.82-0.97), the window when preventive interventions such as progesterone, cerclage, and low-dose aspirin are most effective. Kaplan-Meier analyses confirmed significantly earlier delivery among high-risk pregnancies identified by the three-protein panel.
conclusionsThis maternal serum test provides a reliable approach for early risk assessment of sPTB. The three-protein panel demonstrated reproducible performance across cohorts and across PPROM-positive and PPROM-negative phenotypes, with the strongest discrimination in the first and second trimesters, when preventive therapies such as progesterone or cerclage are most effective. These findings support its potential as an early, clinically actionable screening tool for improving pregnancy outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.