ArticleBMC health services research2026
Relational coordination among healthcare professionals in acute care: a mixed-methods study of tasks involving prehospital assessment units.
Article in BMC health services research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPrehospital Assessment Units were recently introduced to emergency medical services in Denmark. These units are designed to assess, triage, and treat patients on-site, and either release, refer to alternative care pathways, or arrange hospital conveyance. The initiative has increased the need for effective collaboration among healthcare professionals in acute care services, including paramedics, nurses, and physicians in emergency medical services, municipalities, emergency departments, and general practice. This study investigates Relational Coordination among healthcare professionals involved in this task for patients triaged by the Prehospital Assessment Units in the Region of Southern Denmark.
methodsA mixed-methods study, inspired by a convergent parallel design, was conducted based on the framework described in the theory of Relational Coordination. This theory highlights the importance of Communication (Frequent Communication, Timely Communication, Accurate Communication, and Problem-Solving Nature of Communication) and Relationships (Shared Goals, Shared Knowledge, and Mutual Respect). Data were collected between April and August 2024 via online questionnaires and in June 2024 through focus groups.
resultsQuestionnaire responses from 138 healthcare professionals were analysed, and 18 participated in the focus groups. Most collaborative ties were classified as moderate and strong. However, weaker ties were identified in Timely Communication and Frequent Communication, and Shared Knowledge, highlighting challenges in both dimensions of Relational Coordination. The qualitative analysis produced four themes: 1) Insufficient communication due to low quality or lack of written communication, 2) Navigating care through phone calls to share information, 3) Multiple objectives with hindered observers, driven by the coexistence of different objectives of the unit and limited insight into the whole care pathway, and 4) Interprofessional tensions in acute care collaboration, based on challenges regarding the competencies, incentives, roles and responsibilities required to achieve the best care pathway for each patient.
conclusionThe collaboration among healthcare professionals for patients triaged by the Prehospital Assessment Unit was generally classified as moderate to strong. However, critical challenges were identified. Optimising task assignments, enabling municipal correspondence, and addressing discrepancies in objectives, competencies, and roles may improve collaboration. These findings point to broader lessons for strengthening prehospital and inter-organisational coordination internationally, where challenges of information flow, role clarity, and mandate alignment are common.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.