Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41629878›Full record

ArticleBMC oral health2026

The effect of the flat-side in an engine-driven full-sequence file system on root Canal disinfection: a preliminary ex vivo investigation.

Mahmoud Manaa, Soha Elhady, Jukka Matinlinna, Gianluca Plotino, Mohammed Turky

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC oral health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Mahmoud ManaaDepartment of Endodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Minia University, Minia, Egypt.
Soha ElhadyDepartment of Medical Microbiology & Immunology, Faculty of Medicine, Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt.
Jukka MatinlinnaDepartment of Biomaterial Science, Division of Dentistry, Manchester University, Manchester, UK.
Gianluca PlotinoPrivate Practice, Rome, Italy.
Mohammed TurkyDepartment of Endodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Minia University, Minia, Egypt. m.torky.abdelrazik@mu.edu.eg.ORCID 0000-0002-4250-9951

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEffective root canal disinfection is a critical component of predictable root canal treatment, yet obstacles remain in completely eradicating bacterial biofilms from the entire root canal system. Recent advances in instrument design, such as flat-side instruments, have been proposed to improve root canal disinfection and debridement. While conventional rotary instruments have been thoroughly evaluated, there is a paucity of data on the effectiveness of flat-side multi-file rotary systems in reducing the microbial burden within root canals. Therefore, this exploratory laboratory study was designed to assess the influence of the flat-side design in a full-sequence rotary file system on root canal disinfection compared to its conventional counterpart, aiming to establish initial data to guide further larger-scale research with more holistic microbial evaluations.

methodsThirty mandibular first molars were selected according to specific criteria. After establishing an access cavity and ensuring root canal patency in all samples, the teeth underwent a cycle of autoclave sterilization. Enterococcus faecalis suspension was introduced into the root canals and incubated at 37 °C for 21 days. After bacterial contamination, an initial bacterial sampling (S1) was taken, and the specimens were distributed into 2 experimental groups according to the instrument design (n = 10 per group): flat-side full-sequence rotary files group (FS group); and its conventional prototype file system (CP group), along with positive and negative control groups (n = 5). At the end of the root canal preparation, another bacterial sampling (S2) was performed to determine the number of colony-forming units per mL (CFU//mL), and the results were compared with a robust ANOVA and the Games-Howell post hoc test with the significance level set at 5% and a confidence interval of 95%.

resultsNone of the tested endodontic instruments succeeded in completely eradicating the root canal infection. However, the flat-side instruments showed a significant reduction in bacterial load, achieving a mean value of 2.78 ± 0.11, compared to their prototype counterparts, which had a higher mean bacterial load of 3.77 ± 0.32 (p-value < 0.05).

conclusionInstrument design can affect root canal disinfection. Flat-side instruments may be more effective in reducing the bacterial burden from root canals than their traditional counterparts. However, this conclusion was derived from a preliminary investigation conducted under specific conditions. Therefore, to enhance the reliability and generalizability of the current outcomes, it is crucial to conduct further investigations with an adequate sample size across diverse laboratory and clinical settings, as well as variations in root canal morphology, to provide a more comprehensive understanding of the impact of this design on root canal infection. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The present preliminary findings suggest that while complete elimination of infection remains challenging, advancements in instrument design, such as the flat-side instruments, could enhance bacterial reduction within root canals.

Indexed as

Dental InstrumentsDental Pulp CavityDisinfectionRoot Canal PreparationBacterial LoadBiofilmsDental AlloysEnterococcus faecalisEquipment DesignHumansMolarNickelTitaniumDental AlloysNickelTitaniumEndodonticsEnterococcus faecalisFlat side instrumentsInstrumentsRoot canal treatment

Identifiers

PMID41629878
PMCPMC12947473

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.