Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41629870›Full record

ArticleBMC infectious diseases2026

Distribution of bacterial etiologic agents and antimicrobial susceptibility patterns in sterile body fluids collected at Tikur Anbessa Specialized Hospital, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.

Senay Getahun Bayu, Rodas Getachew Abera, Wondimu Woldeyohanis Gulilat, Dessie Abera, Kassu Desta

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC infectious diseases, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Senay Getahun BayuMedical Diagnostic Laboratory, Tikur Anbessa Specialized Hospital, College of Health Sciences, Addis Ababa University, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. senaygetahun1986@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0005-6702-4589
Rodas Getachew AberaMedical Diagnostic Laboratory, Tikur Anbessa Specialized Hospital, College of Health Sciences, Addis Ababa University, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1476-5525
Wondimu Woldeyohanis GulilatMedical Diagnostic Laboratory, Tikur Anbessa Specialized Hospital, College of Health Sciences, Addis Ababa University, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
Dessie AberaDepartment of Medical Laboratory Sciences, College of Health Sciences, Addis Ababa University, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
Kassu DestaDepartment of Medical Laboratory Sciences, College of Health Sciences, Addis Ababa University, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSterile body fluid infection requires rapid and accurate diagnosis and treatment, as its morbidity and mortality are high. Continuous laboratory surveillance is necessary to guide clinicians in providing effective, preventive, and evidence-based antimicrobial therapies.

objectivesTo determine the prevalence of bacterial growth, characterize bacterial isolates, and assess antimicrobial susceptibility patterns in sterile body fluids collected at Tikur Anbessa Specialized Hospital, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.

methodsA hospital-based cross-sectional study was conducted from April 11 to July 11, 2023, among 205 consecutively enrolled patients. Data were collected through interviews using a pre-tested questionnaire. The sterile body fluids were processed according to standard procedures. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing was performed using the Kirby-Bauer disc diffusion method, as outlined in the CLSI guidelines. Multivariable logistic regression was used to evaluate the associations between outcomes and predictor variables. A P value < 0.05 was considered to indicate statistical significance.

resultsApproximately one-fifth (19.5%, n = 40) of the processed samples were culture-positive. Most of the pathogens detected were gram-negative bacteria (GNB), 72.5%, while gram-positive bacteria accounted for 27.5%. Gram-negative isolates were 25 (86.2%) sensitive to amikacin and meropenem, 22 (76%), while gram-positive isolates were sensitive to ciprofloxacin, 8 (72.7%). Among the GNB, 51.7% were extended-spectrum beta-lactamase producers, while 48.3% were carbapenemase producers. Multidrug resistance (MDR) was detected in 67.5% of the isolates. Among these MDR isolates, 23 (79.3%) were GNB, while 4 (36.3%) were gram-positive. Culture positivity was associated with rural (vs. urban) residence (AOR: 3.86, 95% CI: 1.58–9.42, P = 0.003), inpatient (vs. outpatient) status (AOR: 2.65, 95% CI: 1.17–5.99, P = 0.019), presence (vs. absence) of comorbidities (AOR: 5.46, 95% CI: 2.22–13.40, P = 0.001), turbid (vs. clear) appearance (AOR: 3.37, 95% CI: 1.17–9.70, P = 0.024) and use (vs. no use) of indwelling devices (AOR: 0.125, 95% CI: 0.033–0.471, P = 0.002).

conclusionsSignificant drug resistance to commonly prescribed beta-lactam antibiotics and high MDR were observed, necessitating the use of prudent antibiotics in hospital and community settings.

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsBacteriaBacterial InfectionsBody FluidsAdolescentAdultAgedbeta-LactamasesChildChild, PreschoolCross-Sectional StudiesEthiopiaFemaleGram-Negative BacteriaGram-Positive BacteriaHospitals, SpecialAnti-Bacterial Agentsbeta-LactamasesAntimicrobial susceptibilityBacterial infectionsCarbapenem-resistant bacteriaESBLMultidrug-resistant bacteriaSterile body fluids

Identifiers

PMID41629870
PMCPMC13037161

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.