ArticleBMC complementary medicine and therapies2026
Herbal bitters in routine integrative care: a real-world prescription database study from a Swiss hospital.
Article in BMC complementary medicine and therapies, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIn traditional medicine, natural remedies are often used based on empirical observation and experimental knowledge. Even today, the prescription of phytotherapeutics at major centers for integrative medicine, such as Klinik Arlesheim (KLA) in Switzerland, frequently reflects physician experience rather than a purely guideline-based approach. Therefore, prescribing patterns may offer valuable insights into the clinical logic and cultural framework behind the use of specific remedies. This study examines the use of bitter herbal preparations at KLA as a case example of how routine health data can support hypothesis generation and provide insight into therapeutic culture.
methodsThis real-world data study involved the analysis of KLA’s prescription database between 2018 and 2019. A total of 301,821 prescriptions were screened, focusing on 66,038 prescriptions containing 34 predefined natural bitter remedies. The analysis was narrowed to 10 frequently used mono- and multi-herbal bitter preparations. Indications, forms of administration and prescribing clinical departments were analysed descriptively.
resultsA total of 10,660 prescriptions of bitter preparations were identified. Bitter preparations were most frequently prescribed in psychiatry and oncology particularly for patients experiencing anxiety, stress and stress-related nausea. This pattern diverges from their traditional gastrointestinal use and may reflect evolving clinical applications in integrative care. The study also demonstrates the potential of structured clinical data to surface novel patterns and research hypotheses.
conclusionThe prescribing patterns of bitter substances observed in this study highlight underexplored areas of integrative care, particularly in psychosomatic and oncological contexts. These findings underscore the value of structured, practice-based data as a window into lived therapeutic traditions. Future research should examine both the clinical effects and efficacy as well as the cultural dimensions of phytotherapeutic use, including the unconventional administration of herbal bitters.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.