Trial reportBMC public health2026
Micro-exercise breaks every hour: a feasible strategy to improve metabolic health in sedentary office workers.
Trial report in BMC public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundProlonged sedentary behavior in office workers is associated with increased metabolic health risks, including impaired glucose regulation and insulin resistance. While the benefits of structured exercise are well-established, feasible workplace interventions remain limited. This study investigated whether brief hourly micro-exercise breaks could improve metabolic health markers in sedentary office workers in Nanchang, China.
methodsA 12-week randomized controlled trial was conducted with 86 sedentary office workers (aged 25–55 years). Participants were randomized to either an intervention group (n = 43) performing 3-minute micro-exercise breaks every hour during workdays, or a control group (n = 43) maintaining usual behavior. Primary outcomes included fasting blood glucose, 2-hour postprandial glucose, and insulin resistance (HOMA-IR). Secondary outcomes included anthropometric measures, blood pressure, lipid profiles, physical activity levels, and work productivity. Seventy-nine participants (91.9%) completed the 12-week assessment.
resultsAt 12 weeks, the intervention group showed significant improvements from baseline compared to controls in fasting blood glucose (mean difference: -0.31 mmol/L, 95% CI: -0.42 to -0.20, p < 0.001), 2-hour postprandial glucose (mean difference: -0.58 mmol/L, 95% CI: -0.75 to -0.41, p < 0.001), and HOMA-IR (mean difference: -0.42, 95% CI: -0.55 to -0.29, p < 0.001). The intervention group also demonstrated reductions in waist circumference (-2.1 cm, p = 0.001), systolic blood pressure (-3.9 mmHg, p = 0.002), and improvements in HDL-cholesterol (+ 0.1 mmol/L, p = 0.04). Participants reported higher energy levels (+ 1.6 points, p < 0.001) and improved work productivity (+ 1.3 points, p < 0.001). Mean adherence was 82% (range: 65–97%), with 82.5% of participants achieving ≥ 80% adherence. No serious adverse events occurred.
conclusionsHourly 3-minute micro-exercise breaks represent a feasible and effective strategy for improving metabolic health in sedentary office workers. This simple, equipment-free intervention can be readily implemented in workplace settings to reduce cardiometabolic risk.
trial registrationNot applicable. This study was registered with the Academic Ethics Committee of Nanchang Health Vocational and Technical College (approval number: NCHVC-2024RT-2419) but was not registered in a clinical trial registry as it did not meet the criteria requiring trial registration under Chinese regulations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.