ArticleBMC geriatrics2026
The impact of social support on pain intensity in older adults with chronic pain: the serial mediating roles of positive and negative affect and pain catastrophizing.
Article in BMC geriatrics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Chronic Pain in Older Adults: Risk Factors and Prevention.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Family Functioning and Kinesiophobia in Patients After Pacemaker Implantation: A Cross-Sectional Serial Mediation Study of Pain and Pain Catastrophizing.Journal of pain research · 2026Article
- Unmet health-related social needs are associated with pain outcomes among midlife and older adults.Frontiers in pain research (Lausanne, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundChronic pain in older adults represents a major public health concern, with non-pharmacological interventions gaining importance as a key strategy for pain management. Social support, positive and negative affect, and pain catastrophizing are known to be associated with pain intensity in older adults. This study aimed to investigate the effect of social support on pain intensity in older adults with chronic pain and to explore the mediating roles of positive affect, negative affect, and pain catastrophizing.
methodsThis cross-sectional study involved 363 older adults with chronic pain who completed the Social Support Rating Scale (SSRS), Positive and Negative Affect Scale (PANAS), Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS), and Numeric Rating Scale (NRS). Serial mediation analysis was conducted to test whether positive and negative affect and pain catastrophizing act sequentially as mediators between social support and pain intensity. Structural equation modeling (SEM) was conducted using Mplus 8.3 to examine whether positive and negative affect and pain catastrophizing serially mediate the association between social support and pain intensity.
resultsSocial support was negatively associated with pain intensity, both directly and indirectly, through the separate mediating effects of positive affect (β = -0.129, 95% CI: -0.176, -0.082) and pain catastrophizing (β = -0.199, 95% CI: -0.262, -0.136). The sum of these indirect effects accounted for 49.84% of the total effect. Furthermore, social support was indirectly associated with reduced pain intensity via the serial mediation of negative affect and pain catastrophizing (β = -0.088, 95% CI: -0.131, -0.059) and the serial mediation of positive affect and pain catastrophizing (β = -0.066, 95% CI: -0.099, -0.043). These pathways collectively accounted for 23.40% of the total effect.
conclusionHealthcare providers (e.g., nurses, physicians, and therapists) should enhance chronic pain management by assessing patients' social support levels and implementing interventions focused on emotional regulation and cognitive restructuring. An interdisciplinary approach is recommended to effectively reduce pain intensity in older adults.
trial registrationNot applicable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.