Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41629817›Full record

ArticleBMC medical imaging2026

Exploration of prognostic prediction models for renal cell carcinoma using diffusion relaxation correlation spectroscopic imaging.

Mengying Zhu, Yuansheng Luo, Xiaobin Wei, Jingli Chen, Shihang Pan, Guangyu Wu, Guiqin Liu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical imaging, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Mengying Zhu *Department of Radiology, Renji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, 160 Pujian Road, Shanghai, 200127, China.
Yuansheng Luo *Department of Radiology, Renji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, 160 Pujian Road, Shanghai, 200127, China.
Xiaobin WeiDepartment of Radiology, Renji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, 160 Pujian Road, Shanghai, 200127, China.
Jingli ChenDepartment of Radiology, Renji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, 160 Pujian Road, Shanghai, 200127, China.
Shihang PanDepartment of Radiology, Renji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, 160 Pujian Road, Shanghai, 200127, China.
Guangyu WuDepartment of Radiology, Renji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, 160 Pujian Road, Shanghai, 200127, China. gywurenji@126.com.
Guiqin LiuDepartment of Radiology, Renji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, 160 Pujian Road, Shanghai, 200127, China. sdzclgq@126.com.

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China NSFC 82371912Science and Technology Commission of Shanghai Municipality 23Y11903900
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe prognosis of renal cell carcinoma (RCC) varies greatly, and accurate prognostic stratification is crucial for optimizing clinical management. This study aims to evaluate the feasibility of predictive models based on diffusion relaxation correlation spectroscopic imaging (DR-CSI) in distinguishing RCC patients with different clinical outcomes.

methodsA total of 127 RCC patients who underwent DR-CSI were enrolled, cohort 1 (48 patients) for model development, and cohort 2 (79 patients with postoperative follow-up) served for validation. DR-CSI results were analyzed using spectral equipartition method combined with multiple feature selection methods and classifiers, generating models from 2*2 to 9*9. Clinicopathological, conventional MR parameters and SSIGN were used for comparison. Diagnostic and prognostic performance were assessed using AUC, DeLong’s test, Kaplan‒Meier analysis, and multivariable regression.

resultsDR-CSI-based models showed excellent interobserver agreement (ICC: 0.86–0.99). In cohort 1, the 6*6 model achieved the highest diagnostic performance for distinguishing metastatic from non-metastatic RCC (AUC = 0.87), significantly outperforming clinicopathological and conventional MR parameters (vs. age, P < 0.001; vs. tumor diameter, P = 0.002; vs. WHO/ISUP grade, P < 0.001; vs. ADC, P = 0.001; vs. T2 value, P < 0.001). In cohort 2, the 6*6 model achieved an AUC of 0.85, which was significantly higher than SSIGN (AUC = 0.73, P = 0.012). This model was also an independent predictor of RCC recurrence (P = 0.005).

conclusionsThe DR-CSI-based 6*6 model provides accurate assessment of RCC aggressiveness and shows great promise for prognostic risk stratification, offering a valuable non-invasive tool for clinical decision-making.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, Renal CellDiffusion Magnetic Resonance ImagingKidney NeoplasmsAgedFeasibility StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPrognosisDiffusion relaxation correlation spectroscopic imagingPrediction modelPrognosisRenal cell carcinoma

Identifiers

PMID41629817
PMCPMC12955329

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.