ArticleBMC bioinformatics2026
Contrastive learning in both structure and function spaces improve drug-target interaction prediction.
Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundIdentifying drug–target interactions (DTIs) is essential in drug discovery and repositioning. Recently, deep learning has become the mainstream methodology for DTI prediction. However, the scarcity of three-dimensional structural data has forced almost all methods to predict drug-target interactions with low-dimensional data, thereby constraining their overall performance.
methodsIn tackling this challenge, we introduce a novel approach, CLSF-DTI. CLSF-DTI incorporates high-dimensional structural and functional information into the drug and protein features through contrastive learning during the feature extraction stage. This ensures that the model no longer solely focuses on sequence information, leading to a more precise modeling outcome.
resultsExperiments on five benchmark datasets demonstrate that CLSF-DTI achieves the best overall performance among five state-of-the-art baselines. Through ablation studies, we further prove that the contrastive module enhances the predictive performance and generalization ability of CLSF-DTI. Moreover, CLSF-DTI successfully identified some ligands for the protein PKA-Cα in drug screening experiments.
conclusionsThis study proposed a contrastive learning model CLSF-DTI that integrates structural and functional similarity. It outperforms existing methods in drug-target interaction prediction and has stronger generalization ability. However, the handling of unbalanced data and long-distance dependencies still needs to be improved in the future. The data and source code are available at https://github.com/ZhangLab312/CLSF_DTI .
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.