Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41629761›Full record

ArticleJournal of animal science2026

Providing a supplemental source of water or a trace-mineral-based drinking solution upon feedlot arrival affects intake, growth performance, and health of newly received finishing calves.

Mackenzie M Smithyman, Vinícius N Gouvêa, Dayna L Campbell, Glenn C Duff, Clint A Löest, Reinaldo F Cooke, Matthew R Beck, Mark E Branine

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of animal science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Mackenzie M SmithymanDepartment of Animal and Range Sciences, Clayton Livestock Research Center, New Mexico State University, 15 NMSU Ln, Clayton, NM 88415, United States.
Vinícius N GouvêaTexas A&M AgriLife Research, 3211 Russell Long Blvd, Canyon, TX 79015, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-8317-4908
Dayna L CampbellDepartment of Animal and Range Sciences, Clayton Livestock Research Center, New Mexico State University, 15 NMSU Ln, Clayton, NM 88415, United States.
Glenn C DuffDepartment of Animal and Range Sciences, Clayton Livestock Research Center, New Mexico State University, 15 NMSU Ln, Clayton, NM 88415, United States.
Clint A LöestDepartment of Animal and Range Sciences, New Mexico State University, 2980 S. Espina St, Knox Hall, Room 202, Las Cruces, NM 88003, United States.
Reinaldo F CookeDepartment of Animal Science, Texas A&M University, 474 Olsen Blvd Suite 133, College Station, TX 77843, United States.
Matthew R BeckDepartment of Animal Science, Texas A&M University, 474 Olsen Blvd Suite 133, College Station, TX 77843, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-8571-5184
Mark E BranineZinpro Corporation, 7500 Flying Cloud Dr, Eden Prairie, MN 55344, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-4778-6069

Funding

New Mexico State Agricultural Experiment StationZinpro Corporation
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The objective of this study was to evaluate the effects of providing a supplemental water source (SWS) or an experimental nutrient repletion solution (NRS) following feedlot arrival on intake, growth performance, health, and immune responses of newly received calves. A total of 270 weaned lightweight British × Continental crossbred heifers (initial body weight [BW] = 236 ± 19 kg) were ranked by shrunk BW and allocated into 18 soil-surfaced pens (12 × 35 m; 15 heifers/pen). Treatments were: 1) Control (CON): water was provided through a standard in-pen automatic waterer only; 2) Supplemental water source (SWS): CON plus water provided with one additional 416-L stock tank/pen; 3) Experimental nutrient repletion solution (NRS): provided with one 416-L stock tank/pen as the only source of drinking solution. The SWS and NRS were provided from days 1 to 4, after which supplemental tanks were removed. From days 5 to 56, all heifers had only access to the standard in-pen automatic waterer. Heifers had ad libitum access to feed and water and the WI was measured daily throughout the experiment. Body weights and blood samples via jugular venipuncture were collected on days 1, 4, 14, 28, and 56. A treatment × day interaction was observed for average BW, ADG, and water intake (P ≤ 0.05). SWS and NRS increased DMI compared to CON during days 5-15 (P < 0.001), and the increase in DMI persisted for SWS compared to CON between days 16 and 29 (P < 0.01). The ADG was lower for NRS compared to CON during days 1 to 4 (P < 0.01), and water intake was greater for SWS and NRS compared to CON between days 1 and 4 (P < 0.001). No differences between treatments were observed for morbidity and mortality rate (P ≥ 0.28). The cumulative incidence of BRD tended to be lower for SWS compared to CON during days 9 to 27 (P ≤ 0.10). No treatment or treatment × day interactions were observed for any of the plasma hormones and metabolites evaluated (P ≥ 0.11), except for plasma glucose, which tended to be lower for NRS compared to CON (P = 0.10), and serum antibody titers against bovine viral diarrhea virus, which were greater for NRS compared to CON (P = 0.02). Providing SWS or NRS to high-risk newly received beef calves for 4 d after arrival to the feedyard may increase water, feed intake and immune response.

Indexed as

Drinking WaterEatingMineralsTrace ElementsWaterAnimalsCattleDietDietary SupplementsDrinkingFemaleDrinking WaterMineralsTrace ElementsWaterbeef cattlebovine respiratory diseasehydrationimmune responseinflammationstress

Identifiers

PMID41629761
PMCPMC12990311

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.