ArticleJournal of assisted reproduction and genetics2026
Cumulus cell-mediated sperm selection enhances blastocyst quality using sibling oocytes.
Article in Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeCan sperm selection through cumulus cells improve embryo quality compared to conventional methods, and is its effectiveness influenced by parental age?
methodsThis prospective clinical trial included 99 ICSI cycles from 95 couples. Sibling oocytes were randomly allocated at the oocyte level to either the study group (cumulus cell-mediated sperm selection after conventional density gradients centrifugation (DGC), 554 oocytes) or the control group (only sperm selection by DGC, 543 oocytes), using a dish designed to facilitate sperm interaction with cumulus cells. The inclusion criteria for this study were patients using their own oocytes, with a medical indication for ICSI, who had at least 6 mature oocytes (MII) in that cycle. For semen samples, inclusion required the ability to adjust the concentration to 10 million/mL. Exclusion criteria included the use of vitrified oocytes, donated oocytes, and semen samples obtained by testicular biopsy or aspiration. Embryo quality was assessed at the blastocyst stage on day 5 according to ASEBIR. A subanalysis evaluated the influence of parental age on outcomes.
resultsThe study group showed a significantly higher proportion of good-quality day-5 blastocysts compared to controls (55.2% vs. 45.3%, p = 0.028). No statistically significant differences were observed in overall blastocyst formation or pregnancy rates, although favourable trends were noted. In an age-stratified analysis, a significant improvement in day-5 blastocyst quality among evaluable blastocysts was observed in women aged 40-45 (51.4% vs. 30.4%, p = 0.017), with a non-significant trend toward improved outcomes in men aged 40-53 (44.7% vs. 32.6%, p = 0.083). No differences were seen in younger age groups.
conclusionCumulus cell-mediated sperm selection after DGC using a specialized Oosafe® ICSI Dish with Sperm Selection Channels was associated with an increased proportion of good-quality day 5 blastocysts compared with conventional sperm preparation. While clinical outcomes did not differ significantly, these findings suggest a potential benefit in specific ART subpopulations, particularly those of advanced maternal age. Further adequately powered studies are required to confirm these observations and to determine their impact on clinical outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.