ArticleJournal of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics2026
A mechanistic pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic model for degrader-antibody conjugates.
Article in Journal of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Degrader-antibody conjugates (DACs) represent an emerging class of innovative therapeutics that combine the unique delivery capabilities of antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) with the catalytic targeted protein degradation capabilities of proteolysis-targeting chimeras (PROTACs). To support the rational design and optimization of this new therapeutic modality, a pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic (PK-PD) model framework for DACs was developed to integrate the mechanisms of targeted protein degradation and antibody-mediated drug delivery. The model was calibrated with previously published in vitro and in vivo data for DACs and their PROTAC payloads. The PK module for antibody-mediated PROTAC delivery was linked to a PD module capturing ternary complex formation and protein degradation by the released PROTAC. Downstream pharmacological activity, such as inhibition of cell proliferation for oncology applications, was driven by the changes in target protein levels. The model framework captured the PK and PD of unconjugated and antibody-conjugated PROTACs, linking intracellular PROTAC concentration to protein degradation, in vitro cell proliferation, and in vivo tumor growth inhibition. Model simulations enabled exploration of parameters influencing DAC efficacy, including expression level and internalization efficiency of the surface antigen for antibody targeting, the composition and stability of the antibody-PROTAC linker, and PROTAC payload potency and permeability. The model framework establishes design constraints for antibody, linker, and payload selection and optimization, providing practical insights that can improve the probability of success for novel DAC therapeutics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41629705What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.