Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41629695›Full record

ArticleLearning & behavior2026

Evaluating inhibitory control in captive raccoons (Procyon lotor) using the cylinder task.

Hannah J Griebling, Shylo R Johnson, Sarah Benson-Amram

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Learning & behavior, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Hannah J GrieblingDepartment of Forest and Conservation Sciences, Faculty of Forestry, University of British Columbia, 2424 Main Mall, Vancouver, BC, V6T-1Z4, Canada. hgriebli@student.ubc.ca.
Shylo R JohnsonUnited States Department of Agriculture, Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, Wildlife Services, National Wildlife Research Center, Fort Collins, Colorado, USA.
Sarah Benson-AmramDepartment of Forest and Conservation Sciences, Faculty of Forestry, University of British Columbia, 2424 Main Mall, Vancouver, BC, V6T-1Z4, Canada.

Funding

Special UBC Graduate Scholarship-FRST Doctoral Fellowship 6372
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Inhibitory control is an executive function that allows humans and non-human animals to suppress a prepotent response and continue in goal-directed behavior when outcomes are delayed. In non-human animals, inhibitory control has been proposed to be an important component of behavioral flexibility, where animals must inhibit previously used behaviors to establish new ones. The cylinder task has become a widely used, detour-reaching task to test motor response inhibition in many non-human animal species. Here we directly test motor inhibition in raccoons for the first time using a modified version of the cylinder task. Raccoons have demonstrated behavioral flexibility traits such as repeated innovation and reversal learning but have not been tested for motor response inhibition specifically. Five wild-caught, captive raccoons participated in the familiarization and detour procedures of the cylinder task, and we found an overall 60% pass rate in their cylinder task performance. We used k-means clustering to compare raccoons to other species tested in the cylinder task and found that raccoons cluster in the moderate performance group. Raccoons' expression of persistence may lead to their moderate cylinder task performance while benefiting them in tasks related to behavioral flexibility, such as problem solving.

Indexed as

Behavior, AnimalInhibition, PsychologicalPsychomotor PerformanceRaccoonsAnimalsFemaleMaleAnimal cognitionComparative cognitionDetour taskMotor inhibitionMotor response inhibitionRaccoon

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.