Observational studyAnnals of surgical oncology2026
Smaller Circular Staplers Do Not Compromise Postoperative Quality of Life in Esophagojejunostomy: A CT-Based Clinical Trial.
Observational study in Annals of surgical oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe optimal size of circular staplers for esophagojejunostomy remains a subject of debate, with concerns that smaller staplers may increase the risk of postoperative complications and impair quality of life (QoL). The purpose of this study was to evaluate the impact of circular stapler size and anastomotic lumen diameter, measured via postoperative computed tomography (CT) imaging, on patient-reported quality of life following esophagojejunostomy. PATIENTS AND
methodsThis prospective observational cohort study included patients who underwent esophagojejunostomy using circular staplers. Anastomotic lumen diameter was measured using postoperative CT imaging. Quality of life was assessed at a 6-month follow-up using the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) QLQ-STO22 and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status scales. Outcomes were compared across stapler sizes and corresponding lumen diameters.
resultsNo statistically significant differences in EORTC QLQ-STO22 or ECOG scores were observed between stapler size groups. Additionally, anastomotic lumen diameter showed no correlation with quality-of-life outcomes.
conclusionsSmaller circular staplers, often used due to intraoperative anatomical limitations, do not adversely affect postoperative quality of life. These findings suggest that insisting on larger stapler sizes may be unnecessary and that smaller staplers can be used safely when indicated.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41629691What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.