ArticleJournal of imaging informatics in medicine2026
Performance Evaluation of a Commercial Deep Learning Software for Detecting Intracranial Hemorrhage in a Pediatric Population.
Article in Journal of imaging informatics in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study evaluates a commercially available AI tool (Aidoc) for intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) detection-originally trained on adults-in pediatric patients, addressing the critical need for timely diagnosis and current research gaps in pediatric AI applications. This single-center, retrospective study included pediatric patients aged 6-17 who underwent head CT between January 2017 and November 2022. Radiological reports (unaided by AI) and CT images were analyzed by natural language processing (NLP) and image-based algorithms, respectively, to classify ICH presence or absence. Ground truth was assumed for concordant cases. Three radiologists independently reviewed discrepant cases using majority vote. Among 2502 pediatric patients undergoing head CT, the AI algorithm flagged 292 cases as suspected ICH-positive. A total of 174 discordant cases between NLP and AI were independently reviewed to create the reference standard. Results showed 144 true positives, 6 false negatives, 148 false positives, and 2204 true negatives, yielding sensitivity of 96.0% (91.5-98.5%) and specificity of 93.7% (92.6-94.7%). Overall algorithm accuracy was 93.8% (92.8-94.8%). The most frequent false positives were choroid plexus calcifications and hyperdense venous sinuses, while subdural hemorrhages accounted for most false negatives. This deep learning AI algorithm trained on adult data performs well in detecting pediatric ICH, with 96.0% sensitivity and 93.7% specificity. However, common false positives, choroid plexus calcifications and hyperdense venous sinuses, reflect pediatric-specific features, while missed subdural hemorrhages mirror known adult limitations. Results highlight the need for pediatric-focused AI training to improve diagnostic accuracy in this underserved population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41629667What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.