Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41629641›Full record

ArticleNature plants2026

Large slow-growing hydrophytes increase wetland carbon storage.

Hao Liu, Jinquan Li, Jihua Wu, Bo Li, Ming Nie

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Nature plants, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Hao LiuState Key Laboratory of Wetland Conservation and Restoration, National Observations and Research Station for Wetland Ecosystems of the Yangtze Estuary, Ministry of Education Key Laboratory for Biodiversity Science and Ecological Engineering, and Institute of Eco-Chongming, School of Life Sciences, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.ORCID 0000-0002-5096-6343
Jinquan LiState Key Laboratory of Wetland Conservation and Restoration, National Observations and Research Station for Wetland Ecosystems of the Yangtze Estuary, Ministry of Education Key Laboratory for Biodiversity Science and Ecological Engineering, and Institute of Eco-Chongming, School of Life Sciences, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Jihua WuState Key Laboratory of Wetland Conservation and Restoration, National Observations and Research Station for Wetland Ecosystems of the Yangtze Estuary, Ministry of Education Key Laboratory for Biodiversity Science and Ecological Engineering, and Institute of Eco-Chongming, School of Life Sciences, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.ORCID 0000-0001-8623-8519
Bo LiState Key Laboratory of Wetland Conservation and Restoration, National Observations and Research Station for Wetland Ecosystems of the Yangtze Estuary, Ministry of Education Key Laboratory for Biodiversity Science and Ecological Engineering, and Institute of Eco-Chongming, School of Life Sciences, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.ORCID 0000-0002-0439-5666
Ming NieState Key Laboratory of Wetland Conservation and Restoration, National Observations and Research Station for Wetland Ecosystems of the Yangtze Estuary, Ministry of Education Key Laboratory for Biodiversity Science and Ecological Engineering, and Institute of Eco-Chongming, School of Life Sciences, Fudan University, Shanghai, China. mnie@fudan.edu.cn.ORCID 0000-0003-0702-8009

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China (National Science Foundation of China) 32430065National Natural Science Foundation of China (National Science Foundation of China) 32471831National Natural Science Foundation of China (National Science Foundation of China) 32501442National Natural Science Foundation of China (National Science Foundation of China) 32522064
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Wetlands, among Earth's most carbon-dense ecosystems, are vital for climate change mitigation. While plant diversity has been widely shown to increase soil carbon storage in terrestrial ecosystems, its influence in natural wetlands remains unclear. Here, using data from 1,268 natural wetlands surveyed in the US National Wetland Condition Assessment (NWCA), we examined how trait-based plant diversity (functional diversity) and composition (functional identity) affect soil carbon storage. We show that functional diversity had a minimal effect on carbon stocks, and its influence was weakened by elevated soil nutrient availability and non-native plant stress. In contrast, soil carbon storage was generally greater in wetlands dominated by larger, slow-growing and highly hydrophytic plants. Moreover, the benefits of functional identity were contingent on higher water levels and lower human disturbance. These findings suggest that the conservation and restoration of wetlands dominated by large, conservative and hydrophytic species under hydric conditions could help achieve climate change mitigation goals.

Indexed as

CarbonCarbon SequestrationPlantsWetlandsBiodiversityClimate ChangeSoilCarbonSoil

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.