ArticleJournal of robotic surgery2026
Impact of an intraoperative Trendelenburg break on perioperative outcomes during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.
Article in Journal of robotic surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The objective of this study is to assess the effect of an intraoperative steep Trendelenburg break during robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (RALP) on perioperative outcomes and positioning-related complications. A retrospective chart review was performed of patients who underwent RALP at our institution. Patients who underwent a steep Trendelenburg break (T-break) were identified and compared to those who did not undergo a steep Trendelenburg break (No T-break) via univariate analysis using the Kruskal-Wallis test for continuous variables and χ2 test for categorical variables. Binomial logistic regression was used to model 30-day complications as a function of time. Multiple linear regression was used to determine factors influencing time in steep Trendelenburg. 247 RALP were included in the study, of which 13 underwent a T-break. No differences were observed in patient demographics or pathologic characteristics. Patients undergoing a T-break were more likely to have increased operating time (p = 0.0009) and increased time spent in steep Trendelenburg (p = 0.0023). No significant differences in major perioperative outcomes or 30-day complication rates were observed between groups. One episode of conjunctivitis was observed in the No T-break cohort. Logistic regression analysis found no association between duration of steep Trendelenburg and 30-day complication rate. Positioning-related complications following RALP were rare. In this retrospective study, adoption of an intraoperative T-break was not associated with differences in 30-day complication rates. Further studies are needed to better define the role of this intervention in urologic pelvic surgery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41629628What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.