ArticleScientific reports2026
Histopathological examination of the effects of two different laser types on the osteochondral defect created in the rabbit temporomandibular joint.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The objective of this research was to evaluate the comparative efficacy of a novel dual-wavelength low-energy laser versus a traditional single-wavelength system on the repair of experimental osteochondral defects in the rabbit temporomandibular joint. Twenty-two adult male New Zealand White rabbits were utilized for this investigation. An osteochondral defect was created in the temporomandibular joint of the experimental group rabbits using a handpiece and a drill. Rabbits in the control group did not receive any regenerative treatment. Experimental animals in Group 1 (Epic10 laser) were treated with a single wavelength conventional laser, while a new generation dual wavelength low energy laser was applied in Group 2 (GRR laser). After the laser application protocol, joint samples were taken from the rabbits. They were sent to the pathology unit for pathological examination. The histopathological assessment focused on several key parameters: the defect filling ratio, reconstruction of the osteochondral junction, cellular morphology, and matrix staining. Defect filling, osteochondral junction, and cellular morphology were higher in Group 2 (GRR laser) compared to the other groups. However, the findings were not statistically significant. (p > 0.05). Matrix staining differed significantly among the groups (p = 0.027). According to matrix staining scores, Group 2 (GRR laser) treatment showed the highest success rate. Within the limits of this study, low-energy laser therapy shows more favorable histological trends in osteochondral defects of the rabbit temporomandibular joint.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.