ArticleScientific reports2026
Interpretable machine learning unveils non-linear inflammatory thresholds and synergistic interactions in post-burn hypertrophic scarring: development of an intelligent clinical decision support system.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Posterior Communicating Artery Aneurysm Microsurgery: PComA-CORE, an Anatomy-Informed Explainable AI Framework for Complexity, Neurovascular Risk, Oculomotor Recovery and Functional Outcome.Medical sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Hypertrophic scarring (HS) following severe burns remains a persistent rehabilitative challenge, yet traditional linear prediction models fail to capture the non-linear pathophysiological complexity of fibrosis. This study aimed to engineer an interpretable machine learning framework to stratify HS risk and elucidate its driving mechanisms. Utilizing a retrospective cohort of 520 severe burn patients, we benchmarked four machine learning algorithms, selecting Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost) for model construction. The SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) framework was integrated to decode algorithmic decision-making, specifically analyzing feature contributions and interaction effects. We benchmarked four machine learning algorithms, selecting Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost) for model construction. The XGBoost model demonstrated superior discrimination (AUC: 0.905, 95% CI: 0.865-0.945) and calibration (Brier score: 0.112) compared to conventional logistic regression. Decision Curve Analysis confirmed the model's incremental clinical net benefit (range: 0.01-0.85). We successfully developed an Intelligent Clinical Decision Support System (iCDSS) that translates complex algorithmic computations into visualized, individualized risk attribution profiles. This framework refines the epidemiological understanding of inflammatory drivers in scarring and offers a promising approach for shifting from empirical prognostication to data-driven precision prevention, pending further external validation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.